Attacking America's Heritage Through 'National Heritage Areas' [re: H.R. 2388]

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCommentary.asp?Page=\Commentary\archive\200209\COM20020906c.html ^ | September 06, 2002 | Peyton Knight

[Stand Watch Listen]

The newest threat to property rights, which are the foundation of American liberty, is posed by H.R. 2388, "The National Heritage Areas Policy Act."

Sponsored by Rep. Joel Hefley (R-Colo.), H.R. 2388 is due for a vote any day now. The bill sets up a process for the creation of National Heritage Areas. It dangles federal tax dollars under the noses of the states, essentially begging them to designate land as a Heritage Area.

Once land is designated, it is subject to the whims and dictates of the National Park Service, setting the stage for myriad property rights abuses and land grabs. It is the key to the radical environmental plan to return as much of the United States landmass to wilderness as possible and to deny the use of as much land as possible to the development of new homes, apartments, businesses, and other uses.

The Heritage Areas Act would ravish property rights. Heritage Areas are not simply honorary designations. They are vehicles for "sustainable development." Once a locality receives a "Heritage Area" designation, its zoning laws become subject to the control of the federal government, and that control, more often than not, shuns property rights in favor of radical environmentalism.

Federal control over local zoning practices happens in one of two ways. It can happen directly, in a binding contract between state and federal agencies. Or it can happen indirectly, with the federal government dispersing funds to environmental agencies or preservation groups who then draw up zoning plans that meet their narrow vision of the world.

This second vehicle is the most sinister, as it gives the impression that local control is preserved when, in reality, the federal government is just peddling its influence through another party.

Already a bad bill, H.R. 2388 has the potential to become even worse as it travels through the legislative process. Amendments and revisions can and will be made on the House floor prior to voting and, if history is any indicator, those amendments may be something to fear.

Land Acquisition

Liberal Rep. Nick Rahall (D-W.V.) is one of the biggest proponents of H.R. 2388. It should be noted that Rep. Rahall presides over the poverty-stricken Coal Heritage Area in West Virginia - a shining example of how Heritage Areas squelch economic development.

When H.R. 2388 was being considered for a vote in the House Resources Committee, Rahall proposed an amendment that would give the government land-acquisition authority. Fortunately, his amendment was rejected. However, H.R. 2388 will go through a similar process before the full House of Representatives and there is little doubt that Rahall and his land-grabbing cohorts will lobby to include land acquisition in H.R. 2388.

The Heritage Areas Act is by no means new to the scene. It existed in the form of H.R. 5044 back in 1994 when it passed the House, but later died in the Senate. Back then, Reps. Hefley and Rahall both sponsored an "Early Action" section in the Heritage Areas Act. What exactly are "Early Actions?" Let them tell you in their own words:

Section 106 (4): "EARLY ACTIONS: After designation of an American Heritage Area, but prior to approval of the management plan for that area, the Secretary may provide technical assistance for EARLY ACTIONS that are important to the theme of the area and that protect resources that would be in imminent danger of irreversible damage without such actions."

So basically, Hefley and Rahall wanted the National Park Service to provide cash and direction to local governments to do their tyrannical dirty work.

"Early Actions" provide the bureaucrats in charge with the power to halt development in areas that are merely proposed for Heritage Area designation. Want to build a house on YOUR property? Not so fast! This area could eventually become a Heritage Area, and we think your house would endanger valuable resources. Never mind that it's your property. Never mind that the Heritage Area doesn't even officially exist. No house for you.

Economic Development

Supporters of the Heritage Areas Act are desperately trying to impress upon an increasingly gullible public that Heritage Areas are conducive to economic development. That this can be said with a straight face is nothing short of incredible.

The enactment of zoning restrictions is hardly a recipe for economic health. In fact, stifling development usually spells misery for local economies and, in these uncertain times, the last thing communities need are federally mandated barriers to economic growth.

The hypocrisy of H.R. 2388's supporters knows some bounds. Even they couldn't bring themselves to pen the words "economic development" in the actual text of the Heritage Areas Act.

Another aspect of the Heritage Areas Act's sordid past bears mentioning. The 1994 version of the bill had a provision that allowed Heritage Areas to be designated as United Nations World Heritage Sites at the sole discretion of the Secretary of the Interior.

Section 105 (b) (3) stated that the Interior Secretary shall "consider any American Heritage Area, designated under this or any other Act, for the nomination to the World Heritage List if the Secretary determines that such area meets the qualifications for such nominations." No hearings, no debate, no nothing.

The tyranny of land-grabbers

When congressional committee hearings were held on H.R. 2388, the bill's sponsors purposefully shut out property rights groups from voicing their concerns. Both the American Land Rights Association and the Property Rights Foundation of America requested to testify and both were rejected.

In fact, during debate on the bill, perennial property rights champion Rep. Richard Pombo (R-CA), offered a commonsense amendment to H.R. 2388 calling for property owners to be notified when their land falls within the boundaries of a Heritage Area. Incredibly, Rep. Hefley and his cohorts voted down this amendment. It seems that they would prefer landowners to be caught off-guard when the National Park Service comes for their property.

The National Heritage Areas Policy Act is just the latest attempt by the federal government to purchase influence over local communities and their zoning practices.

This is not what our Founding Fathers envisioned. They founded our nation on the bedrock of property rights and federalism. That is our heritage. H.R. 2388 seeks to snuff it out.

(Peyton Knight is legislative director of the American Policy Center, an activist think tank headquartered in Warrenton, Va.)

Peyton Knight

[Stand Watch Listen]

indexing

Related Articles

Just a Climate Cowboy (Bush & Kyoto)
Source:Tech Central Station; Published: 29 August 2002; Author: Duane D. Freese

Crying wolf once again! Henry Lamb exposes newest tactics to control America
Source: WorldNetDaily.com; Published: August 31, 2002; Author:| Henry Lamb

Warming Up to the Truth: The Real Story About Climate Chang
Source: The Heritage Foundation; Published: 22 August 2002; Author: Sallie Baliuna

Our Burning Forests Are The Legacy Of Radical Environmentalism
Source: TooGood Reports; Published: June 26, 2002; Author: Mary Mostert

Homegrown Terrorism
Source: Ayn Rand Institute; Published: April 16, 2002; Author: Elan Journo

The Good News About Bad Green Lies
Source: CNSNews.com commentary from the Nation Anxiety Center; Published: April 8, 2002; Author: Alan Caruba

The Terrorist Tactics of Radical Environmentalists
Source: INSIGHT magazine: Published: April 1, 2002; Author: Sean Higgins

ENTER THE JAGUAR - THE LATEST SONORAN DESERT CONSERVATION GAMBIT
Source: AZCorruption.comPublished: March 5, 2002; Author: Tim Serey, PhD.

PETA Under Attack for Funding Alleged Eco-Terrorists
Source: CNSNews.com; published March 8, 2002; Author: Jason Pierce

Wake Up, America
[re:Huntingdon Life Sciences/SHAC/ Animal Liberation Front (ALF), Earth Lib FR- ELF]
Source: Consumer FReedom.com; Published: March 4, 2002;

The Terrorists You Don't Hear About [re: Animal Liberation Front (ALF), Earth Liberation Front (ELF)]
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: March 04, 2002; Author: Tom DeWeese

Biologists conspired to submit fake {LYNX} fur
Source: Elko Daily FREE Press; Published: March 3, 2002; Author: JEFFRY MULLINS

Cabin owners 'deeply alarmed' by forest plan
Source: The Sacramento Bee; Published: March 1, 2002; Author: Evelyn de Ghetaldi and Liz Arnold

Skeptics denounce climate science 'lie'
Source: BBC News; Published: February 25, 2002; Author: Alex Kirby

New Research Indicates the Earth May Be Cooling
Source:: The National Center for Public Policy Research; Published: February 2002:
Author: Amy Ridenour President of The National Center for Public Policy Research

FBI: Left Wing Green Terrorists the most active terror organization in the U.S
Source: The Sierra Times; Published: February 13, 2002; Author: J.J. Johnson

Newfangled 'Fish Protection' Religion Debunked --"Greens" Motive To Bankrupt Oregon Farmers
Source: Toogood reports: Published: February 11, 2002: Author: Vin Suprynowicz

Connecting the Dots in the Case of the Missing Canadian Lynx
Source: NewsMax.com: Published: Feb. 7, 2002; Author; Diane Alden

Scientific findings run counter to theory of global warming
Source: San Diego Union Tribune; Published 1/25/2002; Author: Joseph Perkins

Senate Betrayal Creates “Son of CARA” Monster (re: Conservation and Reinvestment Act )
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: January 29, 2002; Author: Tom DeWeese

Naked Greens
Source: FrontPageMag.com Published: January 23, 2002; Author: Lowell Ponte

The US Does Not Need a “National Climate Service”
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: January 16, 2002; Author: Alan Caruba

Environmental Corruption: A Cascade of Lies
Source: Commentary from the National Anxiety Center; Published: January 07, 2002; Author: Alan Caruba

Feds help fund green activists
Source: The Elko Daily Free Press; Published: 8 January, 2002; Author: JEFFRY MULLINS

"Findings" vs. "Facts" In Washington (re: Global Climate Change Act of 2001/2)
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: December 12, 2001; Author: Patrick J. Michaels

The Heart of Amazonia
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: November 29, 2001; Author: Marc Morano

Timber Industry Warns of 'Eco-Dictatorship'
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: November 27, 2001; Author: Marc Morano

Collectivist Greens Must Use Coercion Enforced By The Central State
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: November 20, 2001; Author: Vin Suprynowicz

Don't forget to attack domestic terrorism, too
Source: The Oregonian; Published: November 19, 2001; Author: Nick Nichols

Environmental Terrorists Also Oppose Civilization
Source: Banner of Liberty; Published: November 13, 2001; Author: Mary Mostert

The Last Word : “environmentalist”; saboteurs
Source: INSIGHT magazine; Published: November 9, 2001; Author: Ralph de Toledano

Have the Muslim Terrorists Merged with Environmental Terrorists?
Source: Banner of Liberty; Published: November 9, 2001; Author: Mary Mostert

Radical Environmentalists Eyed After Discovery Of Bombs On Michigan Campus...
Source: DrudgeReport;; Author: Paul Perterson

Environmental Radicals Not Slowed
Source: AP via The New York Times; Published: November 6, 2001

Environmental Terrorists Deserve No Special Treatment
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: October 26, 2001; Author: Christopher C. Horner

The EcoTerrorist Anthrax Connection
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: October 23, 2001; Author: Tom DeWeese

The Tragic Cost of Environmentalism
Source: Ever Vigilant.net; Published: August 7, 2001; Author: Lee Shelton

New Breed of Environmental Activists has Research Officials Bracing for Vandalism
Source: Pesticide Education Program at Penn State; Published: July 16, 2001; Author: St. Louis Post-Dispatch

The Reality of 'Global Warming'
Source: NewsMax.com; Published: June 13, 2001; Author: Rep. Dana Rohrabacher

California’s Power Crisis - a natural result of rampant Environmentalism
Source: Original Sources; Published: December 27, 2000; Author: Author:Mary Mostert (www.originalsources.com)

The Something Undermining Our Nation
Source: WorldNetDaily; Published: March 19, 1999; Author: Holly Swanson

[Tailgunner Joe]

bump

[Carry_Okie]

Duplicate Thread.

[Carry_Okie]

See #4. Duplicate Thread.

[blackie]

Kill H.R 2388, it's a Bad bill !!

Death To all Tyrant's !!

The Second Amendment...
America's Original Homeland Security !!

Molon Labe !!

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

BumPing

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

BUMP!!!

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

Different title of the one thread probably caused this.

[PhilDragoo]

NO on H.R. 2388

[E.G.C.]

BTTT!!!!!

[o_zarkman44]

Of course the land grabbers would still expect the landowner to pay property taxes even when the control of property rights is taken away. My next question is, once the land comes under complete government control, where does local government obtain property tax revenue to continue to operate local government and schools?
Re-assessment is based on IMPROVEMENTS to the property. Only a true landowner will take pride in ownership. Property growing up in brush and harboring mosquito infestations is not improving anything for anyone. But since when did government really improve on anything?

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

All about the United Nations property robbing and tyrannical laws, right in our back yards happening every day in a neighborhood by you.

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

The U.N. is attacking our very foundation in a way Hitler would admire.

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

time for another bump

[Axenolith]

Jeepers, it can't be that bad, Joel Hefley is an "R"...</Sarcasm>

[Iowa Granny]

More Property Rights stuff. They're coming to get us!!

[E.G.C.]

BTTT!!!!!

[Free Vulcan]

Gun control no longer works as a vehicle for them anymore, so property under control of 'sustainable development' has become the new vehicle. Our dear buddy Ed will probably be in seventh heaven when he hears of this.