Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ravingnutter
You're correct; his termination was because of the school's desire to avoid publicity.

Damn Rosenberg and Nass for their lies, but not the DOJ. It is Rosenberg and her activists at fault.

I notice now she is being much more careful. Seems their own carefully constructed resumes and record of 'expertise' are looking remarkably deceptive- Rosenberg appears to be getting nervous about possible blowback.

16 posted on 09/06/2002 12:43:24 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


...and of course I wouldn't be suprised if the university boardmembers include some folks who belong to the federation of american Scientists and perhaps even to some other activist groups.
17 posted on 09/06/2002 12:45:04 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: piasa; All
Rosenberg

Any relationship to the Originals???

19 posted on 09/06/2002 12:58:45 PM PDT by Lael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: piasa
You must not have seen my post yesterday on the other thread...Hatfield's own attorney admitted that Hatfield "might have" embellished his resume and in a separate interview, admitted that Hatfield was fired from SAIC for failing a lie detector test for a security clearance. Here is what I posted...

News reports have said Hatfill fabricated claims on his resume when he applied for work with SAIC, including falsely claiming to have a Ph.D., experience with U.S. Army Special Forces, and membership in Britain's Royal Society of Medicine.

Hatfill's lawyer, Victor Glasberg, said the Special Forces claim was real, but suggested Hatfill might have been "expansive" with other resume claims. Hatfill was fired from SAIC last year under circumstances neither side has been willing to explain, although Hatfill says the firing has nothing to do with the anthrax investigation.

Sacramento Bee

In reference to the SAIC job which frequently seems to come up in these discussions, Hatfill's lawyer also verified that he was fired from there for failing a lie detector test...

At Fort Detrick, Hatfill never had nor needed security clearance, Glasberg and Dasey said. Once at Science Applications International, he got low-level security clearance for one project. When he was detailed to work for the CIA on another project, a CIA lie detector test was ambiguous when he was asked about his days in Africa, Glasberg said. His clearance was revoked pending an appeal.

Virtually none of Hatfill's work at Science Applications International required a clearance, Glasberg told the Post, but the company used its revocation as a reason to fire Hatfill in February. He said the company has since offered Hatfill settlement payments, which he rejected, and more work, which he accepted.

Newsmax


26 posted on 09/06/2002 2:00:30 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson