Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-US attorney general calls Iraq threat a 'fraud'
Reuters | 9/04/02 | Laura MacInnis

Posted on 09/04/2002 6:58:10 PM PDT by kattracks

WASHINGTON, Sept 4 (Reuters) - Pressing his case against an assault on Baghdad, former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark said on Wednesday the United States had no legitimate reason to attack Iraq and that it would be a grave mistake to do so.

"The claim that Iraq is a threat is a complete fraud. I don't think they believe it for a minute," Clark said, referring to the Bush administration's stated grounds for seeking to topple Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

Clark, who served in the Johnson administration at the height of the Vietnam war, said it would be "the gravest mistake" of any president in his lifetime if President George W. Bush launches a war against Iraq.

The U.S. government has accused Iraq of amassing weapons of mass destruction, a charge Baghdad denies.

"What business is it of the United States to engage in regime change?," Clark asked at a news conference called to announce anti-war demonstrations expected to take place on Oct. 26 in Washington, San Francisco, London, Paris, Berlin and Rome.

Bush said on Wednesday that at the appropriate time he would ask Congress to approve any action on Iraq "necessary to deal with the threat."

Clark has been a vocal opponent of U.S. policy on Iraq and the U.N. sanctions imposed on Baghdad for its 1990 invasion of Kuwait. In Baghdad last week, he urged the United Nations to act to prevent a U.S. assault on Iraq, saying it would breed more violence.

Other American critics of a possible war against Iraq shared their opinions on Wednesday at a Capitol Hill forum chaired by Rep. Dennis Kucinich, an Ohio Democrat.

Some participants warned that a U.S. strike without legitimate reason, could destabilize the Middle East.

"A U.S. invasion would likely be met with fury across the region" American University professor Edmund Ghareeb said.

"Most Arab states view Iraq as a country on its knees, a victim of trigger-happy U.S. policies. An invasion would only serve to galvanize anti-American feelings, and help fulfill the dreams of extremists," Ghareeb said.

© Reuters Limited.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: decay; embalming; formaldehyde; mortuaryscience; ohsaddamfmh; putrefaction; ramseyclark; whisperingglades
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-197 next last
To: SirAngus
Is this what you mean? Note: it's a PDF Link...

Monitoring Nuclear Treaties and Agreements

101 posted on 09/04/2002 8:02:00 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Enough facts about the devious and sinister butcher of Bagdad are such common knowledge, that any who oppose the removal of this cancer by any means whatsoever, are revealing that they were either born yesterday, or else just recently and partially awoke from a twenty year coma.

102 posted on 09/04/2002 8:02:02 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
www.pgt.com/Nuclear/Detectors.html

That's just a public site. I'm sure our military has very elite gear in space.

103 posted on 09/04/2002 8:02:38 PM PDT by SirAngus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: yooper
Yeah, it's almost as bad as his former bosses acceleration of the Viet Nam war. Does Clark realize the absurdity of his statement?

Just what we need. Another democrat telling us how to conduct a war. We've seen the great job they did in the 90s in the area of counter-terrorism.

It seems that they would've served better to use the White House form more than sex romps and photo ops. What about that Mr. Clark?

104 posted on 09/04/2002 8:03:00 PM PDT by AlGone2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
Or, they are america-hating commie-pinko agitators... like Ramsey ;0)
105 posted on 09/04/2002 8:03:11 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: SirAngus
I'd say near half the people I talk to don't want it.

Oh jeez...

106 posted on 09/04/2002 8:03:40 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: SirAngus
"So you wanted to go to war with Iraq before Bush mentioned it"

Speaking for myself only, I thought we should of gone to war with Iraq when we were forced to call back the weapons inspectors in 1998, But unfortunately we had a spinelss worm that was to busy running to the Oval Office sink to bother with a little thing like a ruthless dictator who has been seeking nuclear weapons since the early 70's. and the same fellow who used chemical and biological weapons on Iran and his own poeple. Clinton was a caward and a fraud... Just like most if not ALL LIBERALS. And Ramsey Clark fits the description of a LIBERAL FRAUD

107 posted on 09/04/2002 8:04:34 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: SirAngus
So you wanted to go to war with Iraq before Bush mentioned it?

I think Bush #1 got lousy advice and was hamstrung by the UN resolutions limiting the 91 war to evicting Iraq from Kuwait. Stupid stupid stupid. In war more than any other endeavor, finish what you start.

Also, not everyone wants this war. I'd say near half the people I talk to don't want it.

You extrapolate the perceived (only) positions of your personal cirle of pacifists into the pulse of the nation, huh? How profound. You must be a statistician. I didn't say everybody, did I? I used 250 millions on purpose to allow for commies, idiots and their fellow travelers, with whom this great nation is burdened with many, SirAngus. Mooo

108 posted on 09/04/2002 8:05:29 PM PDT by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Yes, thanks.
109 posted on 09/04/2002 8:08:20 PM PDT by SirAngus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Bisesi; Orual; aculeus; general_re; BlueLancer; tet68

RC is a peacenik freak, part of the blame America FIRST crowd.........pay him no mind!

Believe me, I take Serena's views more seriously than Ramsey Clark's.

110 posted on 09/04/2002 8:08:56 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: SirAngus
"That's just a public site. I'm sure our military has very elite gear in space."

See Post #89

111 posted on 09/04/2002 8:09:21 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Sorry I was on another thread. There is no case for attacking Iraq since the containment strategy is working well. There are higher priorities in the war against terrorism, namely terrorists already in this country, new ones entering our borders, cells of terrorists in many other countries that need to be rooted out and destroyed.
112 posted on 09/04/2002 8:10:58 PM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz; tet68
Thanks for the link, I did a google search on his name earlier and between my memories and reading of his latest escapades I got sick.

tet68 summed it up quite well. :-)
113 posted on 09/04/2002 8:11:05 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Clark is one of the pecuiar type of psychotics determined to lead a life of contrary desperation.
114 posted on 09/04/2002 8:11:38 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: witnesstothefall
your personal cirle of pacifists

No, the people to whom I'm refering are actually a very diverse crowd, which includes co-workers, neighbors, and others. Many of these people I'm not friends with, and did not know their political views.

Also, I'm not a pacifist by any means. I just don't perceive Iraq as big a threat as you do at this time.

115 posted on 09/04/2002 8:14:20 PM PDT by SirAngus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
DEfinately one or the other.
116 posted on 09/04/2002 8:15:32 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
I support his removal but not by our military. We have higher priorities.
117 posted on 09/04/2002 8:16:38 PM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
I only took a few minutes to skim that site, but it appears that the article is about monitoring nuclear events from space. The poster was talking about detection of merely possessing radioactive material.
118 posted on 09/04/2002 8:19:52 PM PDT by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: SirAngus
Sort of like Neville Chamberlin was convinced that Hitler was no threat at that time, right?

"Those too stupid to learn from the lesson of history, are doomed to repeat it", or something like that.



119 posted on 09/04/2002 8:22:08 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; All

120 posted on 09/04/2002 8:22:09 PM PDT by BullDog108
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson