Replies

There needs to be more evidence. I don't see anything substantive.

If I'm not mistaken, it appears that every action taken since September 11th has been against the citizenry and not the terrorists.

I mean, we're being told that the Saudis are friends but Iraq is so much worse? That doesn't make sense, for the vast majority of the terrorists were Saudis.

From the Patriot Act to CFR to "Homeland Security's" vagueness and redefinition to the TIPS program, it appears that everything that has been proposed is against the citizenry. Meanwhile, Bin Laden is a distant memory, and the man that we were going to "HUNT DOWN" is no longer a concern? Actually, Bush signed W199i prior to the September 11 attacks that made it illegal to go after Al Quaida.

It doesn't add up. Granted, I have no problem with America defending itself, and for those who are responsible paying for their crimes. However, there has to be a real connection.

I mean, we're being told that the Saudis are friends but Iraq is so much worse? That doesn't make sense, for the vast majority of the terrorists were Saudis

Is is painfully obvious that a lot of people are clueless about diplomacy and geo-political relationships. Iraq is the linchpin of the Islamic cabal, removing him and WESTERNIZING THE MIDDLE EAST is the ultimate goal of our foreign policy.

Once Iraq becomes civilized, the other states will follow or be isolated or dealt with militarily as well.

The Islamic nations will never be allowed to threaten the USA's survival, as long as the GOP is in power.

Saddam violated the terms of the ceasefire, case closed.