Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rightwing2
"Bush sending heavy M-1 tanks to the Gulf to fight Saddam? This must really be embarrassing for the Chief of Staff of the Army and those other DoD/Army unilateral disarmers who continue to sing the siren song that "tanks are obsolete". What ever happened to Bush's secret plan to drop the 82nd airborne on Baghdad to accept the 425,000 man Iraqi Army's surrender on behalf of the US with the aid of a few thousand light infantry Special Forces troops. Why aren't we sending our Stryker armored car brigade to Iraq for battle testing. The answer-because the Stryker light armored car brigades would be utterly decimated by Saddam's heavy tank forces, but better now than later when the entire US Army is reduced to a tankless army of 1930s era armored cars armed primarily with 50 cal machine guns."

LOL! Well, as you know, Stryker struck out. Looks like the adults, who would actually have to fight in Iraq, are in charge now. I don't care how lousy the Iraqi soldiers are, I still want my Abrams.

30 posted on 09/04/2002 11:05:05 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker
And if they want air-deployable armor, BRING BACK THE M8.
31 posted on 09/04/2002 11:07:02 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson