Posted on 09/02/2002 3:54:11 PM PDT by knighthawk
TEHRAN, Sept 2 (AFP) - Iran's reformist government has thrown down the gauntlet to its conservative opponents with a direct assault on their powers to vet candidates for parliament and other public bodies, parliamentary sources said Monday.
A government bill lodged with parliamentary business managers this week would sharply reduce the powers of a conservative-controlled constitutional watchdog body to pronounce on the fitness of candidates for election, the sources said.
The bill, which has yet to be formally put on the parliamentary agenda, would limit the Guardians Council to a "supervisory role" in elections and give significant oversight powers to moderate President Mohammad Khatami.
It would severely restrict the conservatives' ability to eliminate reformist candidates in municipal, parliamentary and presidential polls due over the next three years as they have done in previous elections.
The reformers' parliamentary majority means that the bill is likely to be passed by MPs if it is put to the vote.
But it will then have to go before the very consitutional watchdog body whose powers it is intended to undermine.
Iranian law gives the Guardians the right to rule on the constitutionality of all legislation approved by MPs, powers they have repeatedly used to stymie government reform measures since Khatami's election in 1997.
In the event of a dispute between the Guardians and MPs, the final say goes to the Expediency Council, another watchdog body on which representatives of the pro-reform government and parliament are outnumbered by conservative jurists.
Current legislation gives the Guardians the right to reject candidates for election they deem "incompetent or disloyal to the fundamental principles of the Islamic regime," including respect for the supreme leadership of spiritual guide Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
They have used those powers to reject not just reformers, but also supporters of the banned but long tolerated liberal Islamic opposition group, the Iran Freedom Movement.
The move against the Guardians' powers came as their chairman, arch-conservative Ayatollah Ahmed Janati, was out of Iran leading a delegation to Yemen.
In this case, AFP is obviously employing the classic definitions, as it relates to change -- pro-change (reformists) vs anti-change (conservatives).
If AFP applied the same definitions to American politics, the Republicans would be the reformists and the Democrats the reactionary conservatives.
I rather doubt that will ever happen, though...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.