Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

  Germany raises stakes against US over Iraq
Telegraph ^ | (Filed: 31/08/2002) | By Hannah Cleaver in Berlin

Posted on 08/30/2002 6:52:25 PM PDT by dgallo51

  Germany raises stakes against US over Iraq By Hannah Cleaver in Berlin (Filed: 31/08/2002)

Germany has further hardened its opposition to a US attack on Iraq, saying it would pull a crucial nuclear, chemical and biological investigation unit out of Kuwait if it took place.

The threat to withdraw the Fuchs armoured personnel carrier unit was made as faith waned in the German government that the US administration would consult its allies and heed their concerns before moving against Iraq.

Peter Struck, the defence minister, said: "If the danger arises that our soldiers could become involved in a military conflict against Iraq, the parliamentary resolution [which enabled the unit to be sent to Kuwait] would no longer cover it."

The threat underlined Germany's emerging role as the leader of anti-US sentiment in Europe.

France has made more careful criticisms of Washington's accelerating campaign, and the conservative leaders of Italy and Spain have been largely silent.

The German election is three weeks away and Chancellor Gerhard Schröder has been using blunt language to indicate the country's opposition to an invasion of Iraq, forcing Edmund Stoiber, his conservative opponent, to adopt a similar stance.

Mr Stoiber said last night he also believed that the tanks should be withdrawn in the case of a lone US attack.

Polls show fierce public opposition to an attack without United Nations backing.

In Denmark, European Union foreign ministers called yesterday for pressure to remain on Iraq to allow UN weapons inspectors back into the country, implicitly rejecting an attack by the US acting alone. They will discuss the issue formally today.

Relations between Germany and America regarding Iraq have deteriorated markedly since March when Mr Schroder said the Fuchs tanks were a vital part of the war against terrorism.

"There are Americans stationed in Kuwait who are fundamental to operation Enduring Freedom. The tanks protect the base there. That is our duty within this partnership," he said.

Now Mr Schroder says he no longer believes Germany would be properly consulted. "Serious consultations must not only concern the how and when, but also the if," he told a Munich newspaper yesterday. "In view of the state of discussions in America, the indication from the US government that we would be consulted later is not enough."

If Washington acted without consulting widely, it alone would have responsibility for the consequences.

Mr Struck said an American attack on Iraq without a UN mandate would be "difficult to justify according to international law".

The six Fuchs vehicles are used to detect nuclear, chemical or biological weapons. The unit can take and analyse samples from a contaminated area to discover what weapons have been used.

© Copyright of Telegraph Group Limited 2002. Terms & Conditions of reading. Commercial information.   Privacy Policy.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiussentiment; attackoniraq; chemical; invasionofiraq; nuclear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Mr Struck said an American attack on Iraq without a UN mandate would be "difficult to justify according to international law".

Hey Mr. Struck! How about the UN mandate to disarm Sadam? Why no concern about his disregard for international law? What are you afraid of, Mr. Struck? That we might find out just how much you progressive appeasers have helped Sadam with his arsenal? That keeping you up late at night, Stucky?

1 posted on 08/30/2002 6:52:26 PM PDT by dgallo51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dgallo51
"Hey Mr. Struck! How about the UN mandate to disarm Sadam? Why no concern about his disregard for international law? What are you afraid of, Mr. Struck? That we might find out just how much you progressive appeasers have helped Sadam with his arsenal? That keeping you up late at night, Stucky?"

Bingo..... You sir.. hit the nail on the head. I just wonder what they will say when Saddam launches a few nuclear tipped scuds into Israel or Saudi Arabia? My guess is Mr. Struck will be dialing 1-800-COL-LECT to the White House with a plea to save them once again

2 posted on 08/30/2002 6:59:26 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dgallo51
What is the attraction Germans seem to find in fascist dictators?
Is it really that hard for them to think for themselves?
3 posted on 08/30/2002 7:02:52 PM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dgallo51
Wasn't it a german firm who helped build Saddams Command and control bunkers in the first place?

Maybe they are afraid of being compromised again.

4 posted on 08/30/2002 7:05:20 PM PDT by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Gerhard Schroeder (sp?) is up for election and he is trying to show the multitudes of Liberals cowards in Germany that he to is a Pu$$y
5 posted on 08/30/2002 7:09:37 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dgallo51
Peter Struck, the defence minister, said: "If the danger arises that our soldiers could become involved in a military conflict against Iraq, the parliamentary resolution [which enabled the unit to be sent to Kuwait] would no longer cover it."

Oh no! We'll never be able to defeat Iraq without Germany! Seriously, these Euro-wussies are just flattering themselves thinking we need their help or approval one way or another.
6 posted on 08/30/2002 7:20:23 PM PDT by Welsh Rabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dgallo51
Deutschland under alles. (More like under Saddam it seems to me - but now they've even sunk lower than France. I'll bet the Easters look at their new nation and think "What a bunch of pussies! Why did we come back to these idiots?")
7 posted on 08/30/2002 7:23:57 PM PDT by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dgallo51
Not to keep beating a dead horse, but NATO is a dead letter.

And if this is an example of EU foreign policy, and it is, the EU is fast fading into irrelevancy.

I think it is clear that we need to start thinking about where we are going to base our troops in the future. There is no longer any reason or advantage to keeping them based in Germany. Germany is no longer faced with any imminent military threat, and it is natural that they have lost interest in the alliance that bought them their existence over the last half century.

It may be annoying, but it is human.

Our whole military strategy is based on the "forward basing" of our forces, but having them on the European land mass, where we have to ask permission to use them makes no sense. In the aftermath of the events soon to unfold in the middle east, it may make more sense to base them there.

After Baghdad has been liberated, the complexion of the region is going to change dramatically. I think we will find it much more comfortable than Germany in a couple of years from now.

I envision a series of bases from Dhahran, to Baghdad, to the Stans. Large scale maneuvers with the Russians and the Indians. Pre-positioning us for what comes next, if the Chinese get snotty with us.
8 posted on 08/30/2002 7:29:15 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
It appears to me that our "allies" are quickly becoming enemy combatants.
9 posted on 08/30/2002 7:35:51 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

It may seem like a terrible thing to suggest this as a reason for killing Iraqi civilians and putting the lives of our servicemen in harm's way, BUT-

So much nonsense is being spewed by the EU re : International law, the need to ask the UN for permission (as if it's already a global overlord!), etc, that I think we HAVE to attack Iraq or appear as if we support (or at least are afraid to oppose) "global governance."

There are other good reasons to go after Saddam-to prevent him from building ever more lethal weaponry, to give the Muslim countries the show of strength that seems to be the only thing they respect and understand-but I believe an attack on Iraq without the UN's approval will help set back global governance.

10 posted on 08/30/2002 7:39:07 PM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Maybe not enemy combatants, But they sure seem to have taken a page from the Jane Fonda School of "Recognizing The Enemy"
11 posted on 08/30/2002 7:40:52 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marron
I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment. We ain't in Kansas anymore Toto!
12 posted on 08/30/2002 8:35:14 PM PDT by dgallo51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
THAT sir, was a low blow!
13 posted on 08/30/2002 8:36:57 PM PDT by dgallo51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
What is the attraction Germans seem to find in fascist dictators?
Is it really that hard for them to think for themselves?

Reminds me of:

"Today marks Springfield's first 'Do What You Want' Festival--a welcome change from the 'Do As We Say' Festival, started by German immigrants in 1946."

--Reporter Kent Brockman from The Simpsons--

14 posted on 08/30/2002 8:43:16 PM PDT by nravoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
It appears to me that our "allies" are quickly becoming enemy combatants.

GERMANY ? an allie? i never thought of them as one to begin with hell the whole country is filled with hate mongers

15 posted on 08/30/2002 8:53:34 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
GERMANY ? an allie? i never thought of them as one to begin with hell the whole country is filled with hate mongers

That's why I put the word allies in quotes.

16 posted on 08/30/2002 9:48:36 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dgallo51
it would pull a crucial nuclear, chemical and biological investigation unit out of Kuwait if it took place.

When Saddam capitulates, about 100,000 American inspectors will swarm the country of Iraq. Europe need not participate.

17 posted on 08/30/2002 9:53:10 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dgallo51
It's too bad the atomic bomb was not ready in time to use it on Germany in World War II.
18 posted on 08/30/2002 10:33:21 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
When Saddam capitulates, about 100,000 American inspectors will swarm the country of Iraq. Europe need not participate.

The Europeans will also be left out of the occupation and rebuilding phase. I wouldn't be surprised if Iraq repudiates the foreign debt accumulated under Saddam to fund his military buildup. When we lift the "no fly zone" and allow commercial aviation I expect the Iraqis will be buying Boeing and not Airbus planes.

19 posted on 08/30/2002 10:37:19 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
The firebombing of Hamburg and Dresden killed more people than the Hiroshima blast.
20 posted on 08/30/2002 10:39:49 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson