Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
As usual you are right on target. When I saw that refigured acres to drop the total burned by 288 acres, (I didn't even bother to calculate the 0.06% change that you did), I had the same questions that you did.

There has too be some reason for trying to keep this fire below 500,000 acres, so they are recalculating or skewering the data.


I guess that 499,780 acres burnt is Politically and probably diversity correct. If it gets over 500,000 acres, some Americans might pay attention to it for a minute or two.
14 posted on 08/30/2002 10:21:02 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Grampa Dave
When you talk about differences that small, you are in the realm of subjectivity regarding what burned and what didn't. They are reading the thickness of lines.
20 posted on 08/30/2002 10:45:08 AM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson