Posted on 08/30/2002 9:24:15 AM PDT by MadIvan
We're in this together, even on a very practical level like that.
Fine. Then cut my logic in half and I do exclude the UK from this:
The subtext of what the Euros, the Continentals, are saying is, "Al Qaeda and militant Islam. Don't hit Europe. We are against the reckless George Bush waging war against Iraq. We admit millions of Muslim immigrants. Osama and associates, surely this must count for something!!!"
Thank you, I consulted my intelligence and didn't understand hardly any of this, except that the author is against the Salafi. :)
Yeah, the Swedes were trying their own new weapon against Islamic proselytism: tryign to turn them into gays. Way to go swedes, your secret weapon does not work... eh eh eh.
LOL, most of it is...except for the part about attracting people who already have particular tendencies and giving them a convenient outlet and justification for those tendencies.
As for me, when I read the part in your post about 3,000 of these phychos all packed together in a group, the first thing that ran through my head was......hmmmmm....PERFECT, AND JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT NUMBER TOO!!
I didn't understand most of it either...I used to think it was a languistic thing, until I picked up some of the Arabic language....now I know that it's just their way of double talking until the listeners' eyes are glazed over with total incomprehension while convincing them, in effect, that "MY jihad is better than THEIR jihad." (same message...different messenger)
Might you have meant "pathologically"?
But what exactly in this story supports the title, "Hijack link to bin Laden."
The best I can see is that they are all adherents to this Salafi "religious sect." My Venn diagram of terrorists and non-terrorists doesn't tell me that all folks in this Salafi group are therefore "Linked" to Mr. Terrorist himself.
Is this flimsy link the absolute best our intrepid intelligence services can come up with?
I remember seeing Big Ben when I was in London, as well as the other famous sites in Whitehall, Trafalgar Square, Covent Garden, Piccadilly, etc, etc. Yank though I am, I would be REALLY angry if they destroyed Big Ben or Westminster Abbey, etc. as well!!! Here on our side of the pond, there has been word for a long time that the muslim savages want to destroy the Statue of Liberty, too!!!!
I believe that "Salafi" is just another name for "Wahhabi", the brand of islamofascism eminating from Saudi Arabia.
They should just round up all the miscreants attending that terrorist "conference" and dump them in Ashcanistan! Come to think of it, that would be a good place to dump other supremacist muslims who are where they don't belong, such as those in the US, Kosovo, Bosnia, etc.!!!
Only if the Northern Alliance gets to punish them. I understand justice is quite swift in those parts.
Regards, Ivan
Perhaps. If so, the most likely target would be Britain, which backed the US war on terror 100% (Thank you Mr. Blair...I really respect you for that.) while the rest of EUroweenie land was saying..."but people might get KILLED", and "It's the fault of the vast, oppressive, pan-zionist conspiracy and we should try to feel the pain of the oppressed Arabs."
I imagine that, because the Brits are showing a spine, the psychos'll carry a grudge for that.
I'm with you 100%, and know the US will stand with Britain if anything like that happens. I've heard that about the Statue of Liberty too...I've often wondered why they didn't hit it. The only possibilities I can come up with are A:) It WAS a target, but one of the planes which hit the Towers missed it and picked up the easiest secondary, or B:) They were afraid to try, because engineer binOpiumLaden wasn't sure how much damage would be done to the copper statue. After all, he says himself how he understimated the damage that would be caused to the WTC.
"I believe that "Salafi" is just another name for "Wahhabi", the brand of islamofascism eminating from Saudi Arabia"
Yep.
I've wanted bin Laden dead for a long time - ever since it became clear he was responsible for the embassy bombings and the USS Cole. A real president would have had his head severed from his shoulders and stuck it on a spike on the White House lawn.
At the time, however, you had a President who was too busy perusing the personnel files and glossy 8 x 10 photos of the interns in his employ.
Best Regards, Ivan
The problem was that we didn't have a president at the time; not for eight years. We had an emptionally stunted frat boy playing Emperor of the US in the Oval Office, and being serviced by his sex slaves.
Well that was what I was implying, but I was being polite. ;)
Best Regards, Ivan
Can you please include our "Nation of Islam" militants?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.