Posted on 08/30/2002 6:21:41 AM PDT by robowombat
Sudeten Germans
This is concerning the story U.S. donates $1 million about the U.S. governments donation for a memorial to honor the 8,000 Muslim men and boys slain in Srebrenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina, in 1995. I was moved and grateful to read that the U.S. government has donated $1 million for a memorial to honor those slain in Europes worst massacre since World War II. But where is the U.S. governments donation for a memorial to honor 266,600 massacred Sudeten Germans shortly after World War II?
Notwithstanding all press reports and history books to the contrary, Europes worst massacre since World War II did not take place in 1995 in the Balkans. Rather, it was unleashed the day the war ended in 1945 in Bohemia, in what is now the Czech Republic, a NATO partner.
The Bohemian macromassacre was carried out by Czech mobs and so-called revolutionary guards who followed to the letter the hate hoots of their model democrat leaders (so described by inventive historiographers).
¶ Woe! Woe! Woe! Three times woe to them! We shall liquidate them! Czech President Eduard Benes, Nobel Peace Prize candidate.
¶ They have no soul, and the only things they understand are salvoes from machine guns! Jan Masaryk, son of philosopher President Tomas Garrigue Masaryk, who was the founder of the most tolerant, most enlightened democracy in central Europe, in the words of a celebrated American historian.
¶ They are not human beings, but only half humans. Czech newspaper Svobodny Smer, July 18, 1945.
Who were they and them? They were the victims of the first, the biggest, and the best covered up post-World War II massacre in Europe. They were the 266,600 Sudeten people of my ethnicity. Most of them were women, children, oldsters, grannies and babies, since most able-bodied men had not returned from the war. They were tortured and slaughtered in ways that would make 1995 Serbian executioners blush, in ways not fit to print in Stars and Stripes.
The massacres have been meticulously documented in voluminous German government archives (albeit not publicized), and the number of victims has been determined by the German Federal Government Bureau of Statistics. But the media world has blanked out this subject for more than 50 years. And for more than 50 years I have been wondering why.
Was it to appease the Warsaw pact during the Cold War, seeing that the Czechs were then one of its members? Is it now to protect the good name of NATO, seeing that the Czech Republic is now one of its members? NATO must dig up mass graves in the Balkans, but in a NATO country? Heaven forbid!
Or is it perhaps to protect the good name of the United States, seeing that our leaders were in cahoots with Benes and Stalin when they blessed the genocide against 3 million Sudeten people under the pious name of transfer 266,600 of them transferred into mass graves?
Or was it simply that the 266,600 victims were Sudeters, an ethnicity not worthy of mention in human historiography, seeing, as we have just seen, that they had no souls. None of them women, children, oldsters, grannies and babies half humans, all of them.
Helmut A. Reichel Aviano, Italy
I'd like to be able to add a sarcasm tag, but I cannot. Even today, Al Sharpton and others of his ilk can engage in racial rhetoric of the worst kind and be given a pass. No White dares do the same.
Permit me to add a brief timeline:
1. In 1918, Bohemia and Moravia are severed from the Austro-Hungarian Empire (to which they had belonged for almost four hundred years) and a large German native population is incorporated in the new Czecho-Slovakian state in direct contravention of President Wilson's (fraudulent) promise of "national self-determination."
2. On March 23, 1933, the Enabling Act is passed by the German Reichstag, effectively making Hitler dictator for life. The Sudentland was still part of Czecho-Slovakia at the time, and the Sudeten Germans had exactly as much say in confirming Hitler's Regime as did the Germans in Poland or Austria - none.
3. On October 1, 1938, the Sudentenland is incorporated in Germany by agreement with the French and English, who gerrymandered the Czech state into existence in the first place.
As a post script, it should be pointed out that on January 2, 1939, Hitler is declared Time magazine's "man of the year."
Right. Wouldn't want it to seem that war can be messy.
Sounds like a good argument to me. Too bad for your side in that contest. Good luck next time, but you'll have be a little faster with the extermination.
It would be interesting to find out who signed the cheque for $1M of taxpayers money to honour allies of Osama Bin Laden. It can bring criminal chages against this individual for embezzlement of public funds.!
"8000 Muslim men and boys" is the biggest hoax since Piltdown Man
Even Kangaroo Kourt in The Hague use the nuber of 1200, not 8000 in its verdict for "genocide" although 1200 is also made up (real nuber was around 600 summarily shot members of Bosnian Army, "an understandable revenge" in humwarrior speak.
Among those "8000 men and boys" who were honored by U.S. were those who died several years prior to conflict, those killed in battle around Srebrenica, as well those who are still alive. Some of them living in Ole U.S. of A. today.
Not all of them are revisionists hoping to reclaim "their land". Some just belong for the opportunity to dress up in traditional costumes and keep their traditional folklore alive.
Others, however, are being difficult and try to throw a spanner into the works.
For these people a special word was coined in the German language: the ewig Gestrigen, loosely translated as "people stuck in the past".
The concept of "group guilt" was the justification behind the Nazi death camps, as it was behind the fire-bombing of Dresden, and the post-war reprisals. It was wrong when the Nazis did it, when the Commuinists did it, and -- although they would like to flush it down the Memory Hole -- when the western allies did it.
That civilians in the Sudetenland should have been punished for what their un-elected government did is not ethically different from the radical Islamist belief that American civilians should be punished for what the American government chooses to do in the Middle East.
When people point out the atrocities that were either hushed up, condoned, or actually committed by the Allies in World War Two, it is not done to exculpate the Nazis, but rather to take down the saintly Allies a notch or two. No one emerged from World War II with clean hands, perhaps because no one entered with clean hands.
So? Kosovo will be incorporated in Albania with the full knowledge and support of the West. Because the "west" approves of something it is automatically correct?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.