Spoken like a true log cabin republican. Excuse me if I don't subscribe to immorality.
I don't believe dd is subscribing to immorality, he's just sayin' these folks who don't understand the logistics of nature are improving his odds at meeting chicks.
FReegards...MUD
But what, precisely, is immoral about men wanting to have sexual relations with other men, instead of women?
To me, something cannot be immoral unless it deliberately harms another person. For instance, murder is immoral. Theft is immoral.
But who is harmed by homosexuality? As far as I can tell, nobody. (AIDS is not deliberate harm, and I don't think you'd be any less resentful of homosexuals who use condoms, so it really doesn't count in the context of this discussion).
If you consider the number of murders and thefts that occur in this world, it seems to me that going after homosexuality has to be about bottom on the world's agenda.
Greyout Davis, as is well documented, has accepted bribes. This unquestionably harms the public as a whole. Is this not worse than tolerating homosexuality, which Davis does every bit as much as Simon, if not more?
Forgive my curiosity. I hope you can answer this in the spirit of friendly inquriy. If you answer it with invective, you're effectively admitting the correctness of my arguments.
D