Replies

I agree with you to a point. The movement needs good conservative hosts to keep the RNC in check - but I certainly don't think Savage is the man for the job.

As far a Rush goes, I think he's struck a good balance of support and criticism of the administration. The administration has made serious mistakes - which Rush has pointed out - and has many achievements - which Rush has pointed out. I listen to Savage, and he is quite entertaining - but he seems to be a parody of the "angry white guy" image of the conservative. He says things to make people angry, then hangs up on them when they get angry. He's hilarious at times - but a bit too cranky for my tastes.

You really should have a conversation with the guy in post 150 - he has exactly the opposite criticism of Rush that you have. It is really quite incredible. But, since you "haven't listened to [Rush] in months" - you cannot possibly know what you're talking about.

A.D.E.

I'll agree with you that Savage is not the ideal spokeman or message carrier. He is #1 in San Francisco, which is left-wing hell, so hopefully he's reaching those that need to be reached out there. Once Lush went to the paid website and all that, he lost me. He also lost me with the golf and cigar talk. There's a guy on KPRC that has a cigar show and a show on 610 if I want to hear about golf. If Lush has changed, please let me know and I'll give him another try. When Savage stays on topic, do you agree with him politically? If not, tell me where you disagree with him.