Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice
The shot from No. 3 gun fired at a range of 560 yards or less struck the submarine at the waterline which was the junction of the hull and coning tower. Damage was seen by several members of the crew. This was a square positive hit.

If this is the sub sunk by the Ward, then the damage should be visible. If it's not there, then perhaps the Ward sank another sub with its depth charges.

21 posted on 08/29/2002 11:26:23 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
then the damage should be visible.

The sub led four other Japanese midget submarines to Pearl Harbor to take part in the attack. The newly discovered sub was believed to be the one sunk by the destroyer USS Ward before the attack began. Wiltshire said the crew is certain that this sub was sunk by the Ward because of a bullet hole in the conning tower and because it still has both torpedoes. Three of the subs have been previously accounted for; the remaining sub had fired both of its weapons.

The damage, apparently, is visible. Strongly suggests that this wreck is the Ward's target. FWIW, I think the wrick should be raised and preserved for the historical artifact that it is. Human remains, if any, should be returned to Japan for burial.

28 posted on 08/29/2002 11:34:45 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson