[dead]

It's not "revisionist" in the least. We've always maintained that we shot first. We sunk a hostile sub in our waters, as we should have.

Their act of entering our waters with hostile intent precipitated our actions, which were wholly justified.

[Willie Green]

It's not "revisionist" in the least. We've always maintained that we shot first. We sunk a hostile sub in our waters, as we should have.
Their act of entering our waters with hostile intent precipitated our actions, which were wholly justified.

Well heck, most sensible people already knew that.
And now they've found the sub, which is historicly interesting.
But it still isn't a valid reason for the sensational headline that questions that fact.
The headline should be more assertive, stating that the sub has been found.
Questioning whether or not we sunk it only leads to revisionist poppycock.