[William Terrell]

This is a really strange article. It claims that Ann's book is riddled with errors, too many to count. But all the author does is excerpt quotes from the book as if just seeing the language used is enough to prove it wrong. The closest to an error he gets is 70 references to civil rights marches instead of the Coulter claimed 100 and an article printed the next day instead of the day after.

This looks like just a fit on the floor to me.

[7thson]

After this book came out, I believe that more and more people are seeing the liberal bias. One glaring example recently is when the network news covered Larry Klayman's Judicial Watch's court action againt VP Cheney. For years, while it was going after Clinton, Klayman was regarded by the press as a hack. Now, the liberal media gives him respectability.

[Drawsing]

Somerby: "'Atheist liberal?' Who uses that term? She makes up a term to make her point. I love those kinds of silly things."

The very absence of such a term is an indication of bias. The unspoken assumption in the media is that there are your average well balanced Oprah watching "normal" people and then there are these rabid, foaming, gap-toothed Christian conservatives who definitely need to be labeled so the proper stereotype is in place before you listen to their ideas.