Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'They can't take away my spirit' (Traficant Whooping Butt Of Demmycrat Candidate!)
The Vindicator (Traficant's Hometown Newspaper) ^ | August 25, 2002 | BERTRAM de SOUZA

Posted on 08/25/2002 3:53:57 PM PDT by PJ-Comix

Poor Tim Ryan, he just can't seem to shake loose the Traficant monkey that has been on his back since he entered the race for Congress.

During the May primary election, Ryan, a Democratic state senator from Niles, was often asked about his relationship with James A. Traficant Jr., the former congressman-turned-federal prisoner. That's because he had worked as a congressional aide to Traficant from the summer of 1995 to 1997 and had talked about him in glowing terms.

Indeed, on April 22, in a meeting with Vindicator editors and writers, Ryan had this to say about the man who had served as the 17th District congressman since 1985, was convicted in April of this year on 10 federal criminal charges, and was sentenced to prison on July 30: "Being 21 years old and having the opportunity to work in Washington, D.C., I saw an extremely charismatic figure who was entertaining. He seemed passionate about helping move this country forward. From what I could see, it was all true."

As for Traficant's criminal activities — federal prosecutors proved that he had used his public position for personal gain, including taking salary kickbacks from close aides — Ryan said the experience was "terrible" and has been "horrific for the Valley."

"It perpetuates the reputation of the Valley," he told The Vindicator. "But it's over. He's going to be in prison."

But as Ryan found out last week, it isn't over. The Traficant monkey is still on his back.

High gear

On Tuesday, on the front page of the Local section (B section), there was a story headlined, "Ryan steps up election campaign." It talked about the Democratic nominee for the reconfigured 17th District seat shifting his election campaign into high gear after taking it somewhat easy since his victory in the May primary.

Unfortunately for Ryan, his contention that "We're starting to step it up," was lost in the buzz emanating from a page one story in Monday's Vindicator headlined, "Attorney says ex-lawmaker refuses to work in the kitchen."

"James A. Traficant Jr. has been placed in lock-down mode after refusing to work in the kitchen at his federal prison, says a lawyer who visited the ex-congressman," the story stated. It quoted Atty. Don L. Hanni Jr., who visited Traficant at the Federal Correctional Institution at Allenwood in White Deer, Pa., as saying that the expelled congressman believed the kitchen job, which pays about $60 a month, should have gone to one of the inmates on a waiting list who has no family and no money in his commissary account.

Hanni said that Traficant asked prison officials to assign him to a recreation facility, which pays about $5 a month.

And here's how the former chairman of the Mahoning County Democratic Party, who was once a political rival of the former congressman and sheriff of Mahoning County, characterized what Traficant had done in prison: "[He's] still looking out for the working guy."

Although he was expelled from the U.S. House of Representatives and although he is serving an eight-year sentence in the federal pen, Traficant will be on the November ballot as an independent candidate for the 17th District seat. In other words, he's competing with Ryan and Republican nominee Ann Womer Benjamin.

But the Traficant saga — that's what it has become in the hands of a veteran politico — doesn't end with his refusal to work. In lock-down, the Poland Democrat was placed in a two-bunk cell with two other inmates and has to sleep on a mat on the floor.

He has hair

Talk about the stuff of political campaigns. Hanni had two other tidbits that may well become part of Traficant's election bid: The federal inmate isn't bald (despite the fact that he has worn a hairpiece for as long as most voters can remember) and he isn't wilting.

Here's what Hanni recalled Traficant telling him: "They can take away my freedom but they can't take away my spirit."

Did Traficant intentionally create a situation whereby he would be placed in lock-down and, therefore, have a story to tell a visitor? No doubt about it.

Poor Timmy Ryan, overshadowed by a convicted felon.

There is only one way for him to get the Traficant monkey off his back: He should call a press conference and repudiate the former congressman with these words, "Mr. Traficant have you no shame? Do us, the honest people of the Mahoning Valley, a favor and get out of the race. I regret ever having worked for you."


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: jimtraficant; traficant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: PJ-Comix
Which, ofcourse, is the REAL reason he is in prison.
21 posted on 08/25/2002 4:51:32 PM PDT by Ima Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
...singing squirrel/wigs...
LOL You're killing me!
22 posted on 08/25/2002 4:55:57 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Saturnalia
Would you mind linking to a copy of the book or at least giving the full name of the author?

Will by G. Gordon Liddy.

I thought EVERYBODY knew who the G-Man is.

23 posted on 08/25/2002 5:13:30 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
LOL You're killing me!

Then you better not enter THE TRAFICANT ZONE or you'll die for sure!

24 posted on 08/25/2002 5:16:40 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Also Traficant said a lot harsher things about Janet Reno and the sellout of American satellite secrets by the Clintonistas to the Chinese for cash than the Republicans in Congress dared say.

How did he vote on impeachment?

25 posted on 08/25/2002 5:36:54 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 07055
How did he vote on impeachment?

Makes no difference. His speeches were way more condemnatory of the Clinton gang than anything I heard from the Republicans.

26 posted on 08/25/2002 5:47:11 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
His speeches were way more condemnatory of the Clinton gang than anything I heard from the Republicans.

Talk is cheap. When the rubber hit the road, he ran.

27 posted on 08/25/2002 5:58:42 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 07055
..."Talk is cheap. When the rubber hit the road, he ran"....

Would his running be any worse than the 55 +/- Republican Senators who unanimously agreed to a kangaroo trial as the Democrats demanded?

28 posted on 08/25/2002 6:13:54 PM PDT by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Rowdee
Would his running be any worse than the 55 +/- Republican Senators who unanimously agreed to a kangaroo trial as the Democrats demanded?

They could have held a 12 month trial with thousands of witnesses and it would not have changed the result because no RATS would vote against their hero.

When he had a chance to vote on impeachment in the House, Traficant voted with his fellow RATS and in support of their hero.

I do hope he wins the primary, but I don't see him as a hero to conservatives.

29 posted on 08/25/2002 6:20:27 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 07055
Talk is cheap. When the rubber hit the road, he ran.

He ran? All Traficant had to do was keep his criticisms in check during his trial. Instead, he let the judge know he was railroaded even though he knew it meant getting the book thrown at him. I don't consider getting an eight year prison sentence something "cheap."

30 posted on 08/25/2002 6:23:23 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
I'm not talking about the criminal trial. I'm talking about how he voted on impeachment.
31 posted on 08/25/2002 6:30:43 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 07055
I don't understand why so many conservatives support this guy. Other than abortion, his voting record is not particularly conservative. He has a lifetime ACU rating of 34. Here is a sampling of last year's votes.

Record-keeping on Gun Purchases HR 2500 (Roll Call Vote No. 244 )2001-07-18 HR 2500 (roll call vote 244).

Moran (D-VA) amendment to the Commerce, Justice, State Appropriations Bill that would have allowed instant background check information, on law abiding citizens, to be kept indefinitely. Now results must be destroyed within

ACU opposed this bill.

This bill was: defeated

The vote was: 161-268 >Representative Traficant voted: Positive

========================================

Cuba Embargo HR 2590 (Roll Call Vote No. 271 ) 2001-07-25

Rangel (D-NY) amendment to the Treasury Appropriations Bill that would have effectively lifted the economic embargo on Communist Cuba.

ACU opposed this bill.

This bill was: defeated

The vote was: 201-227

This Representative voted: Positive

===============================================

Alaska Drilling Ban HR 4 (Roll Call Vote No. 317 ) 2001-08-01

Markey (D-MA) amendment to the Energy Plan that would maintain the current prohibition on oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

ACU opposed this bill.

This bill was: defeated

The vote was: 206-223 This Representative voted: Positive

32 posted on 08/25/2002 6:49:04 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 07055
A few more votes:

Boy Scouts HR 2944 (Roll Call Vote No. 353 ) 2001-09-25

Norton (D-DC) amendment to the District of Columbia Appropriations Bill that would permit the use of local funds to force the Boy Scouts of America to reinstate two homosexual leaders and compensate them $50,000 each.

ACU opposed this bill.

This bill was: defeated

The vote was: 173-243

This Representative voted: Positive +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Ergonomics Rules S.J. Res. 6 (Roll Call Vote No. 33 ) 2001-03-07

This resolution set aside a last-minute Clinton Administration rule imposing deastic controls over workplace conditions.

ACU supported this bill.

This bill was: adopted

The vote was: 223-206 This Representative voted: Negative =================================================

School Vouchers HR 1646 (Roll Call Vote No. 135 ) 2001-05-23

Armey (R-TX) amdnement to the Education Bill that would provide scholarships for students from consistently low-performing of dangerous schools. Scholarships could be used at private, including religious schools.

ACU supported this bill.

This bill was: defeated

The vote was: 155-273

This Representative voted: Negative

33 posted on 08/25/2002 6:52:26 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 07055
To recap, Traficant voted against impeachment, he voted for permanent retention of instant background check documents, he voted to lift the embargo on Cuba, he voted to maintain the ban on drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, he voted to force the Boy Scouts to reinstate gay scout leaders, he voted for Clinton Ergonomic rules, and he voted against school vouchers.

I would vote to put him in jail for eight years just based on these votes.(/sarcasm)

34 posted on 08/25/2002 6:56:34 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 07055
YAWN! I can take a handful of votes of almost any politician and make him look liberal. BTW, many votes are nothing more than procedural votes. What really counts is what he SAID on the floor of Congress. I could see the Demmycrats CRINGING when he attacked Janet Reno and Clinton.
35 posted on 08/25/2002 6:58:40 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 07055
Well...the vote against the embargo (a counterproductive limit on free trade) was a good one. Other than that, pretty bad.
36 posted on 08/25/2002 7:00:03 PM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
I had never known Charles Rangel to sponsor a good bill, but I guess there is always a first time. ;-)
37 posted on 08/25/2002 7:05:19 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 07055
I said nothing about conviction, 07055.....the Republican senatorial caucus unanimously agreed (meaning every single one of them) to hold a Democrat-style trial.

BTW, I'm not talking about heros......just honesty in government.

Regards...

38 posted on 08/25/2002 7:09:56 PM PDT by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rowdee
Would his running be any worse than the 55 +/- Republican Senators who unanimously agreed to a kangaroo trial as the Democrats demanded?

Was it worse? Well, I seem to recall that at least 45 of those senators ultimately voted to remove Clinton from office. So, I would say that any who voted to acquit Clinton are just as bad as Traficant who, despite a lot of hot air, voted against impeachment.

39 posted on 08/25/2002 7:24:19 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Won't it be funny if President Bush pardons him! What would the Democrats say???? Or the newspapers?
40 posted on 08/25/2002 7:48:59 PM PDT by pray4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson