Replies

You're right. Testimony like that would not have helped. Because if he was in that drunken of a stupor he could not have testified that he was in a drunken stupor.

You Westerfield defenders just amaze me. You all act like Hillary and Bill defenders. You ignore the evidence and rely solely on your emotions.

Crystalk knows he's not guilty because she watched the whole trial and he just "looked like an innocent man wronged." Geez, Ted Bundy looked like a boy scout. Jeffrey Dahmer looked like a Boy Scout leader. Wayne Gacy looked like a ...Westerfield. Hmmmm.

Very few Child Molester Murderers look like murderers. They look like people.

You're right. Testimony like that would not have helped. Because if he was in that drunken of a stupor he could not have testified that he was in a drunken stupor.
You Westerfield defenders just amaze me. You all act like Hillary and Bill defenders. You ignore the evidence and rely solely on your emotions.
Crystalk knows he's not guilty because she watched the whole trial and he just "looked like an innocent man wronged." Geez, Ted Bundy looked like a boy scout. Jeffrey Dahmer looked like a Boy Scout leader. Wayne Gacy looked like a ...Westerfield. Hmmmm.
Very few Child Molester Murderers look like murderers. They look like people.

840 posted on 8/22/02 4:34 AM Pacific by P-Marlowe

Good post.

To believe the Save Dave crowd you'd have to be convinced that EVERYONE plotted against him. From LE to the media. Even seasoned attorneys on talk shows ALL said it for over for David Molestorfield. Every last one of them had to be in on the plot ...

Then you'd have to believe a LONG string of coincidences that placed the blood, hair and fiber evidence in his custody.

Add to that the fact that we have to believe that either all the CHILD porn was mailed to him in innocent attachments and he had no idea that he had it or that his son was the sick pervert who collected it.

The jury is to be congratulated. They reached the right verdict after long and careful consideration.