Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeTheHostages
Hmm, well, I do fault the OJ jury in the sense that I think they were quite wrong. But juries rarely are in big criminal cases. Murder has the way of focussing the minds of even the silliest jurors. A lot of what's going on in this thread are flights of fancy that, if one had to focus on a real body and a real murder case, might be extinguished by the cold sober reality.

I've been lurking on this and the "smokey backroom" thread today, but I want to comment on this. I recently served on a jury for a semi-noteworthy murder trial in NYC, we found the defendant guilty, but myself and at least one other juror cried after the verdict was read. I understand that some of the juries in this case cried as well, and several posters have suggested that the jurors must have felt compelled to convict an innocent man. I don't know exactly what they were thinking, but in my case, I cried because the magnitude of the situation was overwhelming -- a woman was stabbed to death, her estranged boyfriend did it, and they had a three-year-old child who would live her life with one parent dead, and the other parent in prison. I had no doubts whatsoever as to the murderer's guilt, and after hearing about the evidence we didn't get to hear in trial, I felt even better about my vote.

And one other thing -- I've often heard it said that if the jury looks right at the defendant before delivering the verdict, they think he's innocent, and if they look away, they're going to vote him guilty. I looked straight at the defendant the whole time the verdict was being read, as I thought he might rush security and try to make a run for it!

828 posted on 08/21/2002 11:39:41 PM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies ]


To: NYCVirago
Re your post #828 -- wow, thanks for sharing. That's an incredible story. Yeah, re the jury looking at the defendant: that's almost an old wives tale. Some times it means something, some times not, the best thing to do is wait for the jury verdict to be read.
849 posted on 08/22/2002 6:14:20 AM PDT by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies ]

To: NYCVirago
we found the defendant guilty, but myself and at least one other juror cried after the verdict was read.

Thank you for your post. I, too, served on a jury years ago. Two defendents, second degree murder. We found them guilty. Several of the women on the jury, including myself, cried after the verdict, although not until we returned to the jury room.

I, too, saw the posts saying jurors would not cry if they were sure of their verdict. WRONG. We were positive our verdict was correct. But as you say, the sense of responsibility and the magnitude of the situation is enormous. It is something jurors do not take lightly.

For the same reason I have posted several times that I am very confident that the jurors are following the judges orders regarding discussing the trial and are also avoiding media coverage to the best of their ability.

887 posted on 08/22/2002 7:21:54 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson