Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw; truth_seeker
The porn verdict was dated 13 Aug. 2002.

That is a piece to the puzzle.

It is not a puzzler. If truth_seeker is correct, then I was correct on my posts last week.

Many, many of the posters on the forum who believed in DW were misconstruing the jury and their evidence requests. These posters were incorrectly thinking that the jury had considered murder/kidnapping then moved on to porn.

This discussion took place last Wed., I believe.

I pointed out that the porn evidence had been requested by the jury on Friday. Then Monday afternoon the Redden tape was requested, then the Redden transcript was requested Tuesday morning. I pointed out that therefore it stood to reason that the porn charge had been dealt with and they had moved on to the murder/kidnap charge.

Evidently, according to truth_seeker, they did indeed sign that verdict form on Tuesday as I had surmised.

Very simple and logical.

667 posted on 08/21/2002 4:22:31 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
Good observations last week. Still a puzzle though.
669 posted on 08/21/2002 4:25:01 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper
A VERY SIMPLE AND LOGICAL BUMP!

Hi cyn.
673 posted on 08/21/2002 4:28:26 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson