[ican'tbelieveit]

You definitely shouldn't spout that LIE to people who have followed this case. THERE WAS NO BLOOD.

[luckodeirish]

I had read (LA Times) and heard (radio) that there was blood in the RV and blood on his jacket that was a DNA match w/ Danielle. Is that incorrect information?

[marajade]

There wasn't any blood? I thought they DNA tested the blood recovered on his jacket?

Hair evidence is still considered just as valid as blood evidence in relation to DNA.

[ican'tbelieveit]

Smacks hands, made a mistake, cannot educate people who worship media/courttv. Bad bad bad fingers. Will retreat to the backroom now.

[twigs]

There was a spot or two of something that contained DNA. Not even sure that it was blood; could have been drool. It was the lack of blood that seemed to indicate to me that she was not murdered in the MH. And the dogs never did credibly hit on her corpse having been there. That's just for starters. Actually, I believe DW knows a lot more than he's telling, but the prosecution did not present a convincing case, IMHO. Brenda lied about dancing with him at Dad's for a reason. I believe she knows a lot more than she's telling, too.