To: Steve0113; marajade
Steve: Take the bug evidence. Four -- count 'em -- FOUR experts testified that her body wasn't where it was found until two weeks after Westerfield was under constant surveillance. That's not "reasonable doubt"?
I don't think you get it: we more than reasonably doubt that you're capable of relating accurately the damming evidence of guilt in this case. We have more than a mere scintilla of doubt that you are misrepresenting the facts. We have a huge doubt as to whether you are even conservative. All these things we doubt. But not Westerfield's guilt.
There, marajade, doesn't that just about sum it up?
To: FreeTheHostages
As a former juror on a child sexual molestation case I can assure you as a juror you discount evidence that doesn't seem to fit with the conclusion that the weight of evidence comes too... If you don't do that a juror, you aren't doing what you are sworn to do...
To: FreeTheHostages
Gosh, I'm crushed.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson