Replies

No, I don't believe any evidence was planted. But I do believe that Danielle could have been in the MH earlier and left DNA evidence. The fact that there was not MORE DNA/blood suggests to me that Danielle was not murdered there. That spot on DW's jacket has not been proven to be blood; it could have been drool. I really think it probably means to he did pick up Danielle and carry her. I tend to think that DW was involved, maybe killed her. I just think that there are too many other potential explanations and the prosecution did not prove its case. (Obviously I'm wrong.) I'm troubled by a lot of the evidence of this case.

They why didn't Westerfield get on the stand and provide testimony to that effect? If that's all it would take to convince you he was innocent why didn't he do it for this jury?

All I can say to you Westerfield supporters is that I hope you never lose a child or family member and have the murderer walk free after jurors such as yourselves acquit him.