To: steve50
Oddly, Foster's sister and remarried widow have joined the OIC in attempting to block Favish's attempt to learn the truth about the deathOddly? I think not. I imagine they just don't want these pictures all over the internet. Enough is enough.
And, no, nobody has a RIGHT to see those pictures, regardless of what the law is concerning them. It's a desecration of the dead's privacy, not to mention the suvivors.
13 posted on
08/21/2002 10:24:22 AM PDT by
Howlin
To: Howlin
I disagree, Howlin. It is a matter of a death being recognized as a murder & not a suicide. I think Fosters widow is still afraid of the clintons, after all these years.
18 posted on
08/21/2002 10:36:51 AM PDT by
Ditter
To: Howlin
If it were my loved one I would not want to think they were so miserable as to commit suicide. That is what is odd about it. There is evidence it was a murder. If it were me, I would rather have that, awful as it is, than suicide, and be able to punish the wrongdoer.
If we wanted the pictures just for some sort of perverse curiosity, it would be wrong but we want them because we suspect murder. I think that's reason enough. Sorry to disagree but I think you're wrong on this one.
22 posted on
08/21/2002 10:44:34 AM PDT by
Samizdat
To: Howlin
And, no, nobody has a RIGHT to see those pictures, regardless of what the law is concerning them. So you don't believe in the rule of law?
35 posted on
08/21/2002 10:53:35 AM PDT by
Wm Bach
To: Howlin
Actually, the dead have few rights. I can call Elvis a skinhead communist invert who collects Beanie Babies and unless he ISN'T DEAD I'm totally safe from a suit. Time to see what really happened to Vince.
54 posted on
08/21/2002 11:56:01 AM PDT by
eno_
To: Howlin
Thanks Howlin, as I scrolled down I was hoping someone would agree that these pictures do not belong in the public domain.
To: Howlin
wrong on all counts.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson