[FreedomFriend]

Why? Because all of us "white folks" have decided not to make babies anymore.

Who says, you? I see plenty of white babies where I live. All I have to do is to go to my nearby Chick-fil-A to see tons of kids. If you go to a nearby walking trail, parents are pushing their kids in strollers, walking them in a backpack on their back, or the kids are riding bicycles or roller blades. All this talk of "not having kids" is a misrepresentation of the truth, even though whites are having fewer children than in past generations. A 1.9 birthrate is not the destructive force that a 1.2 or 1.3 birthrate is. Furthermore, within the past year or two, from reports I've read, the birthrate among white Americans is finally starting to rise.

At current rates, with zero immigration, it would take at least 125-200 years for whites to be a minority in this country. If the U.S. went back to a predominately European immigration policy, then whites would likely never be the minority. Furthermore, you're not taking into the account that birth rates will not stay constant among whites and minorities. They'll likely stabalize somewhere.

What you're advocating is basically a balkanization style immigration policy, especially in this time of group politics.

[Sabertooth]

At current rates, with zero immigration, it would take at least 125-200 years for whites to be a minority in this country. If the U.S. went back to a predominately European immigration policy, then whites would likely never be the minority.

With ethnic intermarriage growing ever more common, the entire matter of ethnic distribution is a sideshow. It's only worth noting to the extent that anti-Caucasian bias reveals the racism of the Left.

My daughter is half Philippino, and has simply been raised to be an American.

Also, your view of ethnic trends of the next 125-200 years is based on the previous paradigm that has endured throughout human history to this day. Two things are permanently changing that paradigm. The first is increased mobility of human populations, worldwide. But that simply accelerates an ongoing trend.

The second is a technological development that is going to change all of our perspectives on ethnicity within two or three generations: gene-splicing and the inclusion of the DNA of animals into the human genome. Our grandchildren and great grandchildren will face the dilemma of how to co-exist on with these new... humans(?).

If folks feel comfortable with a hidden dog gene here or frog gene there, how about a person with genetically engineered cat-eyes, with vertical pupils and third eyelids? The technology to make that happen will be available in a decade or two.

The lesson of WMD proliferation is that technological genies excape from the lamps, and will be aquired by unthinking and unethical people.

Forget about ethnicity, that's not the issue. It diverts our energies and provides ammunition for demagoguery to our opponents. The issues are assimilation to our language and culture (inseperable), and the erosion of American sovereignty and rule of law with respect to Illegal Aliens.