So the idea of a commercial enterprise making money by degrading and insulting the most cherished beliefs of millions on private property is ok by you. And those that object are stiff necked Puritans? What if these losers had slipped into your backyard and performed their "act" for your children and the listening public? Any problem w/ that?
This species of anti-logic is exactly how we come to have pornography defended as political speech. Apparently Larry Flynt is a "journalist" in your lights. And if Hustler is providing a valuable public service why not NAMBLA and child pornographers?
So tell me, why do you consider performing this act in public unacceptable? It is free expression after all.
So the idea of a commercial enterprise making money by degrading and insulting the most cherished beliefs of millions on private property is ok by you.On private property? You'd better believe it. It's called "free speech". Consider that we insult and degrade the most cherished beliefs of liberals here all the time.
One may or may not approve of what's done on a given TV or radio show, or website for that matter. If no one approves or enjoys it, no one will patronize it and it will go away. Freedom is not infringed until one considers banning such things by law.
-Eric