Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aShepard
"This could be a precursor to what the chi-coms plan to do with the Panama Canal sometime when it's in their interests."

Unlike suez, the u.s. has explicit legal rights to take ANY ACTION IT DEEMS NECESSARY to protect the security and neutrality of the canal with NO requirement of consent or consultation prior with the govt. of panama. As far as the doomsday scenarios about chinese influence in canal affairs making it easier to sabotage the canal, I assume the posters have no idea how the canal operates (3 choke points/locks, disabling of any of which rendered canal unusuable), or how vulnerable the locks are to any entity with government-sized resources determined to cause havok.

I remain baffled that the best the Japanese could do to try to render the canal unusable during wwii was their swimmer torpedoes.

113 posted on 08/19/2002 2:26:39 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: WoofDog123
Large tankers and aircraft carriers cannot fit throught the Panama canal, anyway. I don't know how big the Suez canal is, though.
114 posted on 08/19/2002 2:28:39 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson