Replies

Last week we learned that traffic stops are a 'constitutional crisis' and now you are claiming that child support laws are unconstitutional, too. And with an 'absolute certainty.' No doubt you will want to explain why you claim that said laws are treasonous and justifies shooting at law enforcement officers.

I can tell you're an ornery one. I'd be kind of surprised if you learned last week or any other time that traffic stops are a constitutional crisis. If you did, it has nothing to do with me. You might also - as I suggested in a previous post - read the other posts already in the thread. I already said that I don't believe police should be in the line of fire on this one.

I already said that I don't believe police should be in the line of fire on this one.

Only by virtue of the fact that you believe the laws are unconstitutional. Heck, that woman in Ohio claimed that the officer deserved to be shot, and a militia nutcase wrote a letter stating that the LEOs have no business stopping motorists who speed. So your saying they shouldn't be in the line of fire is really dissembling.