Doesn't speak very well for you if that's how you come across, tovarish.
Funny thing you should mock my views of property rights. National security aside, I don't believe in eminent domain. Nor do I believe that assets should be siezeable until after conviction. Nor do I believe in the income tax, capital gains tax, property taxes and virtually all other taxes. Oh and I do not support any restrictions on manufacturing goods that could be used for crimes by miscreants. That means I support the unregulated production of personal firearms (read M16, not RPG-launcher), DVD recorders and similar items.
You don't believe in MY property rights, tovarish. You see, my "widgits" are made of bits and letters of the alphabet. "IP" -- anathema to the marxistanarchistlibertarianoids.
The moment your legislators decided that my right to publish scientific findings was to be sacrificed to protect your "property" was the moment I decided your "property rights" don't mean a damn thing. Your "property" is a parasite that exists only to destroy the Bill of Rights. Face it, you're advocating censorship so you can make a buck. I have no problem prosecuting serious copyright offenders. I have a problem with people telling me I cannot publish any paper I want to as long as it falls within the guidelines of what is protected by the first amendment.