Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 11th Earl of Mar
No because they were criminals. Traficant had a judge that admits a conflict of interest so there is a reasonable doubt about the conviction. I guess it is okay to be a Traitor as Lott is as long as you vote a conservative line right? I don't function that way. If you help a known criminal get off, Which Slick was, then you are abetting that crime. The proof was already there. There are large gaps with no physical evidence linking Traficant to what he is accused of. The blue dress links Slick Willie to purjury. Trent Lott kept slick from facing a real trial. I know you will rationalize it on "they couldn't get a conviction" but that fault, Until he held a real trial, lies with the always vote consevative but let the liberal criminals off SPENT LOTT.

Ravenstar
8 posted on 08/15/2002 7:51:29 PM PDT by Ravenstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Ravenstar
If you help a known criminal get off, Which Slick was, then you are abetting that crime

There's another good reason to believe Traficant is a crook.

9 posted on 08/16/2002 4:28:13 AM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson