To: 11th Earl of Mar
No because they were criminals. Traficant had a judge that admits a conflict of interest so there is a reasonable doubt about the conviction. I guess it is okay to be a Traitor as Lott is as long as you vote a conservative line right? I don't function that way. If you help a known criminal get off, Which Slick was, then you are abetting that crime. The proof was already there. There are large gaps with no physical evidence linking Traficant to what he is accused of. The blue dress links Slick Willie to purjury. Trent Lott kept slick from facing a real trial. I know you will rationalize it on "they couldn't get a conviction" but that fault, Until he held a real trial, lies with the always vote consevative but let the liberal criminals off SPENT LOTT.
Ravenstar
8 posted on
08/15/2002 7:51:29 PM PDT by
Ravenstar
To: Ravenstar
If you help a known criminal get off, Which Slick was, then you are abetting that crime There's another good reason to believe Traficant is a crook.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson