Posted on 08/14/2002 2:13:04 PM PDT by spald
| Labour dove shakes up Israeli politics | |
| By Harvey Morris in Tel Aviv | |
| Published: August 13 2002 17:38 | Last Updated: August 13 2002 17:38 | |
|
Amram Mitzna (pictured) , a former career soldier and current Labour mayor of Haifa, on Tuesday launched a bid for the Israeli premiership after a lightning campaign that has galvanised Israeli politics. The declaration by the dovish 57-year-old reserve major-general that he is standing for the Labour leadership poses a serious challenge to the incumbent, Benjamin Ben-Eliezer, and ultimately to Ariel Sharon, the prime minister, who Mr Mitzna on Tuesday said was "leading the state of Israel nowhere". He urged an immediate resumption of peace talks with the Palestinians and said that, if those failed, Israel should unilaterally withdraw from Palestinian territory and dismantle outlying Jewish settlements. The pro-Mitzna bandwagon has been gathering pace since he first hinted a few weeks ago he was pondering a leadership challenge. A poll of Labour party members last week indicated that, if primaries were held now, Mr Mitzna would trounce Mr Ben-Eliezer with 52 per cent of the vote. The sudden emergence of the Haifa mayor as a credible challenger coincides with Mr Sharon's hints of a possible early election. Although the next election is not due until October next year, the prime minister has indicated he would force an earlier vote, possibly in January, if his controversial budget fails to pass the Knesset this autumn. Mr Ben-Eliezer, clearly rattled by the sudden and vigorous challenge from an outsider to national politics, has tried unsuccessfully to seal a pact with another leftwing Labour challenger, Haim Ramon. His aides have also dusted off the Labour rule book to show that, in the event of early elections, the party could dispense with scheduled primaries this autumn, leaving him as leader. As Mr Mitzna acknowledged on Tuesday, Labour is at a low ebb and many are leaving the party, partly in protest at Mr Ben-Eliezer's role as defence minister in the present coalition and his close identification with the policies of Mr Sharon. "Sitting as part of the government today is not bringing the party to reform and to initiating a new alternative," Mr Mitzna said, noting the strategy of "force and more force" had failed. "The decision to send in the army and the air force [to the Palestinian territories] is not the decision that will lead us to a settlement of our business with the Palestinians." In a clear indication of his readiness to sit down with Yassir Arafat, with whom Mr Sharon refuses to deal, Mr Mitzna said that, if elected prime minister, he would immediately call on whomever the Palestinians chose as their leader to return to the negotiating table. Although he appeared alone on Tuesday on the platform at Labour offices in a working-class neighbourhood of Tel Aviv, Mr Mitzna has already received widespread backing, ranging from the endorsement of Matan Vilnai, Labour cabinet minister, to the blessing of the Viznitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Eliyahu Hagar, an ultra-Orthodox spiritual leader. Mr Mitzna will be leaning heavily on his reputation as mayor of Haifa, Israel's third city, a post he has held since 1993 and to which he was re-elected in 1998 with a 65 per cent majority. It is a mixed city where secular and ultra-Orthodox Jews, Arabs and new Russian immigrants enjoy relatively trouble-free relations. If he wins his bid for the Labour leadership, he could find himself in a showdown with Mr Sharon for the second time. Exactly 20 years ago, the much-decorated tank commander, twice injured in Middle East wars, risked dismissal by calling for the resignation of Mr Sharon, then defence minister, over his conduct of the war in Lebanon. Mr Mitzna said on Tuesday that Mr Sharon was "acting day-by-day, instead of trying to have a real target of where we would like to be in a few years. He is afraid to take difficult, sensitive and problematic decisions". |
looks as if a populist peace movement is developing in Israel.
Been there, done that. This guy is Barak warmed over.
I'm not too sure about that, Alouette. Near the end of the article, it mentions Mitzna as risking dismissal from the tank corps by calling for the resignation of Mr Sharon (then Defense Minister), over Sharon's conduct in the war in Lebanon. I do not recall Barak displaying such balls. It looks to me as if this Mitzna/Sharon confrontation is personal and political.
By Ha'aretz Service
A public opinion poll released Wednesday showed that if elections were held now, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Likud would reap 31 percent of the total vote, and Benjamin Ben-Eliezer's Labor would receive just eight percent.
The result would mean a dramatic gain for the Likud in parliamentary strength, and a catastrophic defeat for Labor. As a result of general elections last held in 1999, Labor is currently the largest party in the Knesset, with 25 seats the Likud currently hold 19 seats in the 120-seat parliament.
The poll, conducted by the Smith research institute, also asked recipients how they would vote if Sharon were to face Haifa's Labor Mayor Amram Mitzna, who Tuesday announced his candidacy for the premiership in an intra-party challenge to Ben-Eliezer. With Mitzna at the Labor helm, the party would receive 14 percent of the total vote, with a Sharon-led Likud taking 30 percent.
Pollster Rafi Smith told Israel Radio that the Labor party has received around 10 percent of the vote in all polls the institute had conducted over the past year. He said the increased support for Mitzna reflected a potential return of Labor voters disaffected by Defense Minister Ben-Eliezer's identification with tough Sharon policies regarding the Palestinians.
Israeli general elections are scheduled for no later than November, 2003, but may be held earlier if the government coalition is significantly weakened in the interim.
The party percentages are crucial to the results of the coming elections.
Although voters in recent elections cast separate ballots for prime minister and for political party representation in the Knesset, the coming election will revert to a prior system in which a single ballot will determine the party makeup of the parliament, and the leader of the largest party will become prime minister-elect.
The poll also showed that if former prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu supplanted Sharon as Likud chief, the rightist party would again receive 31 percent, but a Ben-Eliezer-led Labor would gain 15 votes. Against Mitzna, Netanyahu's Likud would reap 29 percent versus Mitzna's 19 percent.
Undoubtedly due to the large number of Israeli Arabs who live in Haifa and vote for him
I posted an article that appears to divulge a long-standing resentment between Mr Sharon and Mikva. Such conflicts influence voters' preferences and felt it important to post for review and comment.
Considering that most polls show the Likud having twice the support of Labor in elections and Sharon trouncing any Labor candidate, the facts show the opposite. The Financial Times is so increidbly biased that it is ignoring the actual facts on the ground in its haigiography of a far lefty.
The Labor party members are once again showing that they are leftists who will not support a Mizrahi Jew.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.