[Luis Gonzalez]

"You did not provide a supreme court argument."

That's a lie, I gave you the name of the case where the SCOTUS defined who is, and who isn't covered by the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution. The fact that you didn't bother doing the most minimal research, proves the point that you are an intellectually dishonest debater, and lazy to boot.

[H.Akston]

You did not provide a supreme court argument.

That's a lie,

That's a lie. The name of the case is not the argument. You were too lazy to even quote, whereas I've gone to the trouble of quoting Buckley.

You lie,

You're lazy,

And you're intellectually dishonest.

[H.Akston]

By the way, I wasted 5 minutes of my precious life today looking for "phyler v. doe", and couldn't find it. Are you sure it's a real case?