[wimpycat]

I'm in favor of limited government of course, like Clarence Thomas, like William Rehnquist, like my Senator Jesse Helms, like Kenneth Starr, like William F. Buckley, etc. and other people who have a freakin' clue. 9 out of 10 people on FR would agree with me. But I'm NOT in favor of weird, retarded, sub-intellectual, dumbass, paranoid, ill-researched "interpretations" of the Constitution, by self-appointed and self-annointed Constitutional "scholars" and "defenders" who don't know Jack Sh** about it. Stupid BS about driver's licenses and city ordinances, and firecracker fines, etc. being un-Constitutional is so completely out-of-touch with an understanding of the Constitution that it's not even funny. So if americanspirit's logic makes sense to you, then I am NOT the right person for you to be courting.

[american spirit]

We can agree to disagree but if ever take the blinders off just look how we are being regulated to death by an unending blizzard of codes, reg's, etc. The growing property rights movement in the country is continually uncovering the deception used by gov't. types to move people off their land. Study the Klamath Falls case to see how ill-conceived notions of a few enviro/gov't. agencies used false data to literally destroy that farming community.