Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wimpycat
Read #134 please and try to understand the reality of what that post is trying to tell you and some of the other "deep" thinkers on this thread. Your assertion that "if it's not prohibited it's allowed" is so ludicrous as well as moronic.
Don't you think every tyrant in history has used that same rationale?
159 posted on 08/13/2002 1:00:24 PM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: american spirit
I'm still waiting for you to cite which provisions of the Constitution have been violated by city codes and ordinances and the like. Until you come up with an article or amendment of the Constitution, your claims are fraudulent.
161 posted on 08/13/2002 1:03:59 PM PDT by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

To: american spirit
And another thing, do you think anyone should listen to you trying to pass yourself off as a Constitutional scholar when you DON'T EVEN KNOW THE ORIGINS OF COMMON LAW? What else is there that you DON'T KNOW? You're a fraud and a sham, and you do everybody who's really interested in the Constitution a disservice by associating yourself with them.
164 posted on 08/13/2002 1:08:15 PM PDT by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson