Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: habaes corpussel
Your post indicates to me you have no clue.

Oh boy. Your post indicates you refuse to look up the difference between unlawful combatants and lawful combatants. (Or maybe you don’t know the difference; or know a difference exists) It also indicates you refuse to look up the treatment of unlawful combatants in the U.S. since the Civil War.

Hint: they didn’t break a civil law; they didn’t break a criminal law… guess what they broke, and where they belong.

18 posted on 08/11/2002 7:56:35 PM PDT by thatsnotnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: thatsnotnice
"Oh boy. Your post indicates you refuse to look up the difference between unlawful combatants and lawful combatants. (Or maybe you don’t know the difference; or know a difference exists) It also indicates you refuse to look up the treatment of unlawful combatants in the U.S. since the Civil War."

Go to my profile. I have bookmarked several legal sources for people like you who have an ill-informed opinion on this subject. One I understand very well. The term Unlawful Combatant is one that has no legal meaning under US Law or International Convention. Unlawful Billigerent has meaning. Unlawful Combatant? It is a buzzword that is used by the Administration to support its claim.

20 posted on 08/11/2002 8:08:27 PM PDT by habaes corpussel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson