Skip to comments.
New charges in Martha Stewart insider trading scandal
Wired ^
| August 9, 2002
| By Justin Gillis and Ben White
Posted on 08/11/2002 10:50:18 AM PDT by BJungNan
The gravity of the criminal charges against Samuel Waksal, the former chief executive of ImClone Systems Inc., raised fresh questions yesterday about the company's credibility and cast a new shadow over the entire biotechnology industry, battered this year by a loss of investor confidence.
The case, which began as an insider-trading scandal, had already tarnished the reputation of Waksal's friend Martha Stewart, among others. It reached a new level Wednesday with a federal indictment that accused Waksal not only of insider trading but also of forging the signature of ImClone's top lawyer to preserve $44 million in personal bank loans.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: business; dems; do; dont; marthastewart
1
posted on
08/11/2002 10:50:18 AM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: BJungNan
Oops. Forgot something. Link to rest of article
HERE
2
posted on
08/11/2002 10:54:30 AM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: BJungNan
Why does your original link say "Wired", but takes me to "gogov.com" and your link to the rest of the article take me to the Washington Post?
To: Paul Atreides
I have one browser window open to wired, another to gogov and another
where the story is at the Washington Post. Dial up connection is slow so I use multiple browser windows at once. Read one while the other loads. Sometimes I get them mixed up. This time I got 'em really mixed. Sorry about the confusion.
4
posted on
08/11/2002 11:13:07 AM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: BJungNan
Thanks for the post.
So, Congress tags the visible Stewart so its members can once again grandstand rather than letting the grand jury and legal system run what should have once been its course.
Meanwhile, an ever new front opens in the war against capitalism, to where even the elite will one day curse themselves for their destruction of America in eventually realizing that amidst the chaos they will have sewn, there is nowhere left to run.
5
posted on
08/11/2002 11:13:17 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: BJungNan
No problem! You are talking to the king of confusion.
To: onedoug
I firmly believe that if Martha has done something wrong, she should pay the price. However, there are some Clinton cronies who should be answering more questions than she, who are not being called to task.
To: Paul Atreides
I agree though while connected, the Stewart matter is common criminality, where Clintonism gives that extension to some of the most extensive and egregious Treason in American history, which - and, as so connected - tragically, has in fact become a way of seeing, and living in America.
I've always thought myself an optimist. But frankly, unless we can somehow wake-up, I honestly fear that the end-point in #5 is our fate.
8
posted on
08/11/2002 11:59:38 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: onedoug
No kidding! In addition to the crooked Dims, the media are protecting the Clintoids from any serious scrutiny. They would rather write endless blather columns about W and Cheney dealings.
To: onedoug
Ditto for the media. Stewart should charge the papers for the unauthorized use of her name in helping them to sell their newspapers.
10
posted on
08/11/2002 2:20:50 PM PDT
by
TheDon
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson