[usconservative]

I noticed in your reply Bob, that you purposely ignored the actions of some FAB members who rather than answering a DIRECT question, or asking those running the event to "come clean" chose instead to attack me.

Was that intentional?

[usconservative]

Nevermind Bob. I know the answer already. Having caught up on the thread, those person's absence has been noted and speaks volumes.

I stand vindicated.

[Bob J]

Was that intentional?

Yes. Part the agreement to participate on the FAB is that we not disclose comments or issues discussed there outside the FAB board. The original members insisted on that so everyone would feel comfortable in being open and frank in their comments to Jim.

Even though FAB is not active at the moment, I still personally feel it is important to observe the privacy and confidentiality I promised to the members who took part. Hence, my reluctance to reply to your comment. I could have made this statement in my original reply but didn't want to embarass you, but, since you pressured me and implied some duplicity, I was compelled to.

BTW - One of the reasons the FAB is not active is because some members felt it would be okay to not only discuss and forward comments made by others, but to send them to the antifreepers for posting on their board.