[tpaine]

Anyone who pulls a gun on cops over a traffic stop is not a Freeper. Thanks, AM
37 posted on 8/10/02 1:09 PM Pacific by Admin Moderator
_________________________________
because so many FReepers commented on it to state unequivocally that shooting a policeman over a routine traffic stop is plain wrong.
Sadly, the human sentiment against murder was not unanimous on the deleted thread. There was one FReeper willing to praise the murder as a valid way to resolve the "constitutional crisis" of a traffic stop. Others were busy formulating conspiracy theories in their shallow minds. These sorts of vermin should be banned forthwith from the forum. We don't need monsters lurking and posting their bloody drivel.
38 po Cultural Jihad
_________________________________

Apparently, he was registered at FR.

-- Your protest that he is 'not a freeper' only encourages nutcakes like CJ to spout their hysterical hype and make the situation look even more ridiculous.

[Admin Moderator]

I will take that under advisement. However, this comment stands. Thanks, AM

[dirtboy]

-- Your protest that he is 'not a freeper' only encourages nutcakes like CJ to spout their hysterical hype and make the situation look even more ridiculous.

Guess what, tpaine? CJ is right on this one. State and local traffic laws, as long as there are conducted with probable cause as the basis for a stop, are not a Constitutional issue, but are the realm of states and municipalities under the 10th Amendment. Doing 72 in a 60 is probable cause. Waco and Ruby Ridge are sound positions to decry the actions of the federal government. This, however, is NOT a position to do such. Barring other information, the guy was dead wrong here. If he wants to die for his cause, that his his business. But killing a cop for his warped perception of the cause, that is just plain immoral, wrong and insane.

[Cultural Jihad]

... nutcakes ...

Wrong. It was one of your fellow libertarians who declared traffic stops a "Constitutional crisis."