Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massillon officer, suspect killed in chase, shootout
The Canton Repository (OHIO) ^ | Saturday, August 10, 2002 | LORI MONSEWICZ and ROBERT WANG Repository staff writers

Posted on 08/10/2002 6:07:37 AM PDT by ResistorSister

MASSILLON (OHIO) -- A city police officer and a man he was chasing are dead, killed in a shootout at the old Agathon ballfield Friday night.

Killed were Eric Taylor, 31, a four-year veteran of the Police Department, and a still unidentified suspect.

“This is a major tragedy for our city,” said Mayor Francis Cicchinelli, who announced Taylor’s death at Massillon Community Hospital at about 11:45 p.m.

Taylor was married, with three young children.

Investigators from the Ohio Highway Patrol, Massillon Police Department and Stark County coroner’s office remained at the scene past midnight, as did the body of the suspect, a balding, white man who was driving a four-door Ford sedan with Stark County license plates. His body was covered with one sheet, another blocked the view of the more than 100 bystanders who gathered near First Street and Cherry Road NW.

Massillon Patrol Officer Eric Taylor
Massillon Patrol Officer
Eric Taylor

The trouble began shortly before 8:30 p.m. on Route 21 and Edwards Road in Wayne County near Doylestown, according to Lt. Herb Homan, commander of the Wooster Post of the Highway Patrol.

One of his troopers had stopped the southbound Ford on Route 21 at 8:22 p.m. for speeding. The trooper talked with the driver, there was a confrontation and five minutes later, the trooper reported the car was fleeing. He chased it south, and Massillon police got involved.

The chase ended in Massillon east of Route 21, in the ballfield just south of Cherry Road.

The body of the suspect
The body of the suspect.

Lt. Gary Lewis of the Highway Patrol said the man got out of his car with a high-powered semiautomatic weapon, and that he fired first at officers. At least three Massillon officers and a trooper were involved in the gunfire. He said they don’t know which officer fired the shot that killed the suspect nor do they know which shot killed Taylor.

EVIDENCE. An investigator places evidence markers at the scene of a deadly shootout at First Street and Cherry Road NW in Massillon on Friday night.
EVIDENCE. An investigator places evidence markers at the scene
of a deadly shootout at First Street and Cherry Road NW
in Massillon on Friday night. Repository / Bob Rossiter

Scott McElfresh said he was watching television in his home on Cherry Road, northeast of the scene, when he heard shots. He looked out his window and saw flashes from gunfire.

He estimated he heard four shots and then an additional 30 to 40 shots, and that he saw flashes indicating police were returning fire.

“It’s not something you expect to happen in Massillon,” he said.

Other witnesses said they heard 10 to 12 shots.

“We didn’t know if it was fireworks or gunshots,” said Dave Hodgson, who was with friends about a block to the north.

Stark County Coroner James Pritchard said the suspect died of gunshot wounds, but he won’t know how many until he does an autopsy on the man today. He’ll also do an autopsy on Taylor.

Taylor was rushed from the scene to Massillon Community moments after the shooting.

The suspect’s body remained on the corner of a field off of First Street and Cherry Road until after midnight. Police said they had not verified the man’s identification, and they wouldn’t release his name until family was notified.

DEADLY SCENE. A Massillon police officer sits in stunned silence after a shootout that left Police Officer Eric Taylor and an unidentified suspect (on ground at left) dead from gunshot wounds Friday.
DEADLY SCENE. A Massillon police officer sits in
stunned silence after a shootout that left Police Officer Eric Taylor
and an unidentified suspect (on ground at left) dead from gunshot wounds Friday.

Through the early morning, Taylor’s cruiser and the suspect’s car remained in the middle of the field on which The Arena is being built.

The Highway Patrol and Massillon police are sharing the investigation.

They used 44 red cups to mark shell casings and other pieces of evidence on First Street. Bright lights illuminated the scene, showing the back window of a Massillon cruiser was shattered, and glass was scattered across the street.

A helicopter from Columbus was brought in to map the crime scene.

A handful of officers not involved in the investigation showed up at the scene, some in uniform and some in street clothes, somber and stone faced. Family of other officers showed up, patted a couple of officers on the back, shook their hands and hugged them.

A police chaplain met with the family at Massillon Community.

A red tent for officers was pitched in the yard of the Massillon Recreation Center, across the street from the crime scene.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: inthelineofduty; massillon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 501 next last
To: eastforker
[He] was a strong constitutionalist,...

'Strong constitutionalist'? Try anarcho-libertarian-militia-nutcase.

181 posted on 08/10/2002 2:39:28 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Anyone who brandishes a gun at the police over a simple ticket or expired DL or expired registration is troubled in my view.....much less if he took it upon himself to open fire on them first. To almost all LEOs, brandishing a firearm at them after you have fled from the initial scene is going to invite premptive fire. Whichever is the case here is not as crucial as you suggest in my view.
182 posted on 08/10/2002 2:39:37 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I'm curious now. Just what is my agenda and please hold back the anger and explain because I seriously don't understand where you are coming from with your attacks on me. I have no agenda on this matter except that I hate cops being shot. The other comments were replies to posts that are a little off track but I do stay the course when it comes to murder, especially of cops.
183 posted on 08/10/2002 2:39:41 PM PDT by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Anyone who brandishes a gun at the police over a simple ticket or expired DL or expired registration is troubled in my view.....much less if he took it upon himself to open fire on them first.

I would agree. However, none of what you say here is established fact.

184 posted on 08/10/2002 2:41:06 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
It appears irrelevant to us but you can be sure it won't be to our foes.
185 posted on 08/10/2002 2:42:59 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
It would be a little weird but not at all unexpected for the media that was able to question excessive force used in the Rodney King case to believe it was good for a Constitutionalist to be killed for driving over the speed limit. I would imagine if the colors were reversed in this case and the politics, the media would look at it differently.
186 posted on 08/10/2002 2:46:29 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
We are all only going on the report. The reported facts that the cop was rushed to the hospital and died later and the shooter was dead at the scene could lead one to "surmise" that the shooter shot first (and was then shot by other officers)since if he was dead at the scene, he was less likely to have been fired upon and then returned fire but there is the chance he was wounded first and did have a return fire chance but that scenario is less likely. I would guess he got the jump on the poor cop who probably misjudged an angry older white (I think) male.
187 posted on 08/10/2002 2:48:41 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
... to believe it was good for a Constitutionalist to be killed for driving over the speed limit.

Poor fellow. There he was innocently going 15 mph over the unconstitutional speed limit, and a gang-banger police car came alongside to blast him, those Blue Meanies.

188 posted on 08/10/2002 2:49:00 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
You are in my eyes one pathetic individual with either an axe to grind or you realy believe your own drivel.
189 posted on 08/10/2002 2:51:59 PM PDT by eastforker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
A traffic stop is an arrest and some do believe that this is a suspension of the common law right of travel.

Uh, demidog, there is ample caselaw to allow states to set traffic laws regarding safety. Where does your concept end? Can someone do 180mphin a 55mph zone? Drive drunk?

190 posted on 08/10/2002 2:52:36 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Can someone do 180mphin a 55mph zone? Drive drunk?

I know, some people think they can own the highway and cops can't prevent them from doing it. There is a Risk/Return ratio for other drivers imposed by reckless drivers, and drunk drivers tend to confine other drivers, but supposedly that should be tolerated.

191 posted on 08/10/2002 2:54:34 PM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Yeah ---why even try to pull someone over ---if they're driving a little too fast the cops could save time and just shoot them right off.
192 posted on 08/10/2002 2:54:35 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
It would be a little weird but not at all unexpected for the media that was able to question excessive force used in the Rodney King case to believe it was good for a Constitutionalist to be killed for driving over the speed limit. I would imagine if the colors were reversed in this case and the politics, the media would look at it differently.

That's asinine. Rodney King never pulled out a gun. And this guy wasn't killed for a simple traffic stop, but for fleeing such, and then jumping out of his vehicle and shooting at officers, killing one of them.

The conservative movement gets soiled by this kind of idiocy...

193 posted on 08/10/2002 2:55:05 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
Just paraphrasing other's drivel.
194 posted on 08/10/2002 2:55:27 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
I would guess he got the jump on the poor cop who probably misjudged an angry older white (I think) male.

He also could have been shot by a fellow officer on accident.

195 posted on 08/10/2002 2:55:52 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
He also could have been shot by a fellow officer on accident.

It could have been mass suicide, too. Sheesh.

196 posted on 08/10/2002 2:58:43 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
That scenario is much more likely in a no-knock raid or a situation where cops are clustered in a confined area not at the end of a chase when the shooter had been vectored by police cars and the cops are jumping out of their cars to confront an armed man. Possible but unlikely.
197 posted on 08/10/2002 2:58:47 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
He also could have been shot by a fellow officer on accident.

Or maybe he got hit by a meteorite. The Perseids are coming down right about now.

That an irrational government-hating goon jumped out of his car firing a handgun at the cop doesn't rule out death-by-meteorite.

198 posted on 08/10/2002 2:58:57 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Uh, demidog, there is ample caselaw to allow states to set traffic laws regarding safety.

No there isn't. Traffic laws are adjudicated in administrative courts which are not subject to constitutional review. There are several states, Nevada included that have ruled at the Supreme Court level that you are not required to apply for a license in order to drive. Those cases just aren't publicised.

In Nevada a few years back, an 18 year old kid was able to successfuly argue all the way to the Supreme Court that the drivers license is not consitutional. It didn't overturn the drivers license because application for such a license is voluntary.

199 posted on 08/10/2002 2:59:08 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
From the pulled thread: But the 10th clearly leaves the rights to states or municipalities to set their own respective speed limits

The Federal Constitution also requires that a State have a "republican form of government." That means the rule of law, and a Constitution that enumerates the limited powers of the State. If a State's Constitution does not grant it the power to regulate or criminalize vehicular operation or travel on roads, then any such laws or regulations are unconstitutional. Note, however, that a Constitutional grant of a general power to make laws and regulations to secure public safety would suffice.

200 posted on 08/10/2002 3:00:20 PM PDT by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 501 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson