Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bonesmccoy
Good points, Bones, but I just don't trust W doing any kind of shortcuts with the status quo.

I just don't think the Constitution and personal liberty means anything to him.

I would be willing to give W the benefit of the doubt, if it were January 2001, but you know he has not given me or any conservative a single reason to trust or to like him.

But you are right on about the costs of health care.

87 posted on 08/09/2002 11:27:41 PM PDT by caddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: caddie
Good points, Bones, but I just don't trust W doing any kind of shortcuts with the status quo. I just don't think the Constitution and personal liberty means anything to him.

Do you realize under the status quo, insurance companies and HMO's can distribute your information to third party firms who can then market to you, things like Depends and pharmacueticals? They wont be allowed to do that, without your written permission once this goes into effect.

So your choice is do you want to have third parties knowing your medical history or not. If you want legal protection against third parties getting access to and using your info, then you have to support what Bush just did.

122 posted on 08/10/2002 8:48:00 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson