Then lay 'em on us. Show me how you can prove that sex with a child is wrong, according to the "law of nature". There are 10 year olds in college. Prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt that they lack the ability to sexually consent. They can understand quantum physics but they don't have the ability to consent?
Please show me where I have articulated any "laws of nature"?
To me they are just as useless as the "laws of god" when attempting to exercise your faculties as a reasoning human being.
Putting words in other peoples' mouths is a bad strategy; it betrays a tendency to control and insert dogma as proof when examining the role of dogma itself in a discussion.
You are frapster are pursuing the same strategy and it is doomed to fail:
That the appeal to religious zealotry is the only certain way to arrive at these truths.
Simply another way to say "because it is"...
A non-answer.
And another way to say "I give up".