Posted on 08/09/2002 8:59:43 AM PDT by NYer
WASHINGTON (AP) _ Ten Americans and six foreigners were charged Friday with taking sexually explicit photographs of their own children or children in their care and sending them over the Internet to an international child pornography ring, the U.S. Customs Service said.
Forty-five children, including 37 in the United States, were victims and have been removed from the care of those indicted, Customs officials said. Most of them are in the custody of another parent or relative.
The defendants include nine people from seven states who were indicted in Fresno, Calif., along with six residents of Denmark, Switzerland and the Netherlands. The indictment alleges that members of the ring, referring to themselves as ``the club,'' traded messages across the Internet requesting photographs of specific sexual poses. One man asked for an audiotape so he could hear a child crying while being spanked, the indictment said, and another posed naked with an underage girl.
The Customs Service coordinated the U.S. investigation that began last November with a request for help from the Danish National Police, who were acting on a tip about an international child pornography ring. ``I congratulate the investigators whose ingenuity and perseverance brought these people to justice,'' Customs Commissioner Robert C. Bonner said in a statement.
The Americans charged include: Lloyd Alan Emmerson of Fresno County, Calif.; Paul Whitmore and Brooke Rowland, San Diego County, Calif.; Tracy Reynolds, Texas; Leslie Peter Bowcut, Idaho; Michael David Harland, Florida; Harry Eldon Tschernetzki, Washington state; John Zill, South Carolina; Craig Davidson, Kansas. The identity of the tenth American was not immediately available.
The foreigners were identified as Eggert Jensen and Bente Jensen of Denmark; Jean-Michael Frances Cattin, Marcel Egli and Peter Althaus of Switzerland; and Dirk-Jan Prins of the Netherlands.
On the Net: Customs Service: http://www.customs.ustreas.gov
AP-ES-08-09-02 1114EDT
True, and therein lies the problem. Today's society equates sex to be as harmless as playing with yourself in the bathtub. And without a God, they would be right. Heck, some species of monkeys fondle each other's genitals as a greeting. It would be no different if we did it, if God was not in the equation.
Here are parents utilizing their children for the sexual pleasure of others..
I guess is sex has no deeper meaning than a hobby you share with friends ..ya share your wife ..ya share your kids...
Otherwise, given a "life" sentence with the general population sounds mighty good.
I earned that one - rebuke heard and received. Thanks.
However, I was (in my sarcasm) skipping way ahead of the discussion. Of course let's also get way ahead of the point here and just go ahead and call me a pathologic religious nut. I do believe that the Divine speaks and that He has spoken and it's not so hard to know His will on such issues. For those who continue to seek the Truth it sounds pompous and arrogant for me to make such a claim and I'm sorry for that too - but it's where I stand. So - in making that admission of myself I repeat the question in more respectful terms.
You speak of truth and I get the impression you speak of absolutes. I would truly love to know (not matter how long it takes) the true foundation of those truths. Who or what is your source? Is that a fair question?
Ok then, for the sake of argument I amend my question and promise that I will not fill it with any sarcasm. My query's are genuine interest.
REPHRASED STATEMENT: From a rational viewpoint I don't believe you can prove it without falling into arguments that are relative in nature.
Now do the anti-Constitution JBTs understand this is different from virtual kiddie porn?
I will, as it befits the situation, refer to the Bible to help people understand why I believe the way I do. However, and I'll go back and look, I have not done so as yet. I have no need as I do not feel that my moral stance is based on a scholarly review of scripture but instead on an innate knowledge by virtue of being created in the image of God.
I also find it interesting that as soon as the notion of "God" is brought into the picture people everywhere decry the argument as void and invalid when all I am doing is trying to illustrate that the mere existance of philosophical question points to the presence of purposeful and personal designer. But of course such things are relegated to superstitious nonsense simply because it incorporates the notion of the divine.
Yet at the same time you assert the notion of Universal Truths and allude to various philosophers who have wrestled with these same issues but each in there turn have "improved" upon the others thoughts or rejected them in some fashion for their own understanding implying not that any or all of them are wrong but that they have not completely settled upon an answer that satisfies their hunger for the truth.
As for there being moral people who are agnostics or of another religion is no surprise. Again, why should we be surprised when that which is created exemplifies the traits of the one after whom they are fashioned?
Of course you'll now say I'm offering circular reasoning and that I cannot be argued with because I rely upon some nebulous and immeasurable quantity. So again, I ask, please help me understand the nature of your moral truths - I think you'll find I'm quite patient and a willing listener despite my earlier sarcasm.
Unless you know of which you speak...... you shouldn't. What makes you think they don't take kiddy-porn seriously in Europe, and what makes you think the US swine involved in this, is any better than the EU swine.
Posted on Thu, Feb. 21, 2002 | ||
Two San Diego men allegedly linked to child pornography ringSAN DIEGO (AP) - Two men arrested on child molestation and child pornography charges were part of an international ring uncovered by a Swedish watchdog group, authorities said. Paul Whitmore of San Diego pleaded innocent Wednesday to 23 counts of child molestation and child pornography charges involving two girls ages 10 and 13. He is being held on $2 million bail. Brooke Rowland, 40, of Poway is scheduled to be arraigned Thursday on similar charges involving five children. He is being held on $1 million bail. San Diego District Attorney Paul Pfingst said Whitmore, a child and family counselor, allowed Rowland to abuse one of the girls he allegedly molested. ``They're exchanging kids,'' Pfingst said. Prosecutors said the two men were part of a child pornography ring in which they exchanged pictures and video of themselves molesting girls to other Internet users. Authorities began their investigation in November after the Swedish affiliate of the child advocacy group, Save The Children, told them about the child pornography they found on the Internet, court documents showed. Police in Denmark, Germany and the Fresno suburb of Clovis have arrested people who were allegedly part of the ring. Their names were not immediately known. San Diego police arrested Whitmore on Jan. 27 and found cameras, computers, photos and videotapes inside his home. Also discovered were leather restraints, rope and handcuffs, according to court records. Whitmore lost his job as a child counselor and computer expert at the Stein Education Center after he was arrested. Authorities said none of the abused children were students at the school. |
Same swingers, different jungle, you know?
Ditto for your response. I agree with you.
That's where I keep your dossier with the virtual pictures of you in leg irons and handcuffs :)
I don't agree that it's the basis of all moral truth - I believe that God is the basis of all moral truth and that something is true by him and through him. Moral truth did not beget God - and by virtue of God being God it is therefore not unreasonable to conclude that which he created should exemplify his nature. Thanks for allowing me to bring this up. At least we have one person willing to discuss moral absolutes in context of spirtual reality.
I don't agree that it's the basis of all moral truth - I believe that God is the basis of all moral truth and that something is true by him and through him.
Hey, you believe your gods truth, - I'll believe in my version of truth, the golden rule. OK?
Moral truth did not beget God - and by virtue of God being God it is therefore not unreasonable to conclude that which he created should exemplify his nature. Thanks for allowing me to bring this up.
Whatever. - That kinda stuff really belongs on the religion forum tho.
At least we have one person willing to discuss moral absolutes in context of spirtual reality.
Thanks, but I don't see reality as being spiritual. We have a mind, & using common sense, we came up with the concept of the golden rule. No big deal.
Must of happened thousands of years before the much more sophisticated concept of only one true god.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.