Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/09/2002 8:17:40 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dead
How about anthrax vaccine and Cipro? Those two things would protect someone handling the stuff, nay?
2 posted on 08/09/2002 8:30:51 AM PDT by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
There is evidence that this outbreak was the result of covert action by Rhodesian security forces.

Huh? First I've ever heard it - or is this just a chance to get in a jab at Rhodesia?

al-Haznawi died on one of the hijacked aircraft.

THIS really spooks me out. I don't like too many coincidences.

6 posted on 08/09/2002 10:40:37 AM PDT by PLMerite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
FWIW - Hatfill to Make Statement Sunday.
7 posted on 08/09/2002 7:20:00 PM PDT by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead; Mitchell; Nogbad; EternalHope
Here's a question y'all might want to ask yourselves. Suppose for a moment it were really true that a rogue US Army scientist was responsible for the post-9/11 anthrax threats, as left-wing activist Barbara Rosenberg has been claiming for the last ten months. Now say you're George W. Bush. You can do practically anything. You make people disappear into secret custody and never even publish their names. The heads of the FBI, the CIA, and the DOJ answer to you. The press hangs on your every word. When do you think you'd want to go public with this hideously embarassing revelation? Would you want to splash it all over the news at the exact same time as you are trying to turn the country to dealing with Saddam Hussein and his biological WMD? Does that seem like a sensible thing to do? Or would you want it to be "old news" by now, or "no news," or maybe something that turns up in the history books thirty years later, like the assassination of Diem? How would you handle it?

This is all being stage-managed to the hilt. The highly publicized due diligence search of Hatfill's home is to set the stage for something else. We are going to find out what that something else quite soon now.

8 posted on 08/10/2002 2:31:55 PM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
For his part, Professor Hugh-Jones does not buy the "international terrorism theory. I think it was domestic."

Why?

9 posted on 08/11/2002 11:34:52 AM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead; The Great Satan; Fred Mertz; *Anthrax_Scare_List
This article contains a number of demonstrably untrue statements, like:

Dr Hatfill also has access to anthrax

, and that anthrax is his area of expertise.

If Australia's libel laws are at all like the UK's (and I believe they are,) Hatfill now has a pretty clear cause of action against this paper. Since this reporter was apparently one of those getting FBI leaks, I think he also has more reason now to complain about what the FBI is doing.

17 posted on 08/12/2002 8:15:57 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
I unnestan that one of the victims was a McCoy. Hatfills and McCoys? Hatfills vs McCoys?! Uh, oh, I think, we're onto sumping here, folks!
24 posted on 08/12/2002 8:44:34 AM PDT by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead
I have never read any theories about the possibility of the person handling the stuff may have known it was deadly and was willing to sacrifice themselves. Kinda like Atta and the clowns he hung out with.
55 posted on 09/10/2002 3:31:38 PM PDT by Ispy4u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson