Anyone wanna take bets on how long it's gonna take the Demonrats to accuse Republicans of the same? I can hear it already!
1 posted on
08/09/2002 4:36:35 AM PDT by
KLT
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: KLT
Let'em try. The amounts speak for themselves. Look at what Jack Grubman has given the Dems for example, and I don't mean just that latest payoff for services rendered.
2 posted on
08/09/2002 4:42:16 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: *Clinton Alumni; *clintonscandals; *Hillary; *Hillary List; Grampa Dave; kristinn; tgslTakoma; ...
Ping Y'All...What a surprise! Hitlery is corrupt!
3 posted on
08/09/2002 4:45:10 AM PDT by
KLT
To: KLT
Contributor |
Occupation |
Date |
Amount |
Recipient |
WAKSAL, ALIZA NEW YORK, NY 10014 |
IMCLONE SYSTEM INC |
11/30/2001 |
$1,000 |
Kerry, John |
WAKSAL, ALIZA NEW YORK, NY 10014 |
IMCLONE SYSTEM INC |
11/30/2001 |
$1,000 |
Kerry, John |
WAKSAL, CAROL MONTCLAIR, NJ 07042 |
NONE/HOUSEWIFE |
3/31/2002 |
$1,000 |
Carden, Timothy L |
WAKSAL, CAROL MONTCLAIR, NJ 07042 |
NONE/HOUSEWIFE |
3/31/2002 |
$1,000 |
Carden, Timothy L |
WAKSAL, ELANA NEW YORK, NY 10007 |
ATTORNEY |
6/18/2001 |
$1,000 |
DNC/Non-Federal Individual |
WAKSAL, ELANA NY, NY 10007 |
IBEAUTY.COM/VP CORPORATE DEVELOPMEN |
6/29/2001 |
$5,000 |
Liberal Party of New York State |
WAKSAL, HARLAN MONTCLAIR, NJ 07042 |
IMCLONE/EXECUTIVE |
3/31/2002 |
$1,000 |
Carden, Timothy L |
WAKSAL, HARLAN MONTCLAIR, NJ 07042 |
IMCLONE/EXECUTIVE |
3/31/2002 |
$1,000 |
Carden, Timothy L |
WAKSAL, SAMUEL NEW YORK, NY 10012 |
|
8/13/2001 |
-$2,000 |
HILLPAC |
WAKSAL, SAMUEL NEW YORK, NY 10012 |
IMCLONE SYSTEMS |
6/11/2001 |
$5,000 |
HILLPAC |
WAKSAL, SAMUEL NEW YORK, NY 10012 |
IMCLONE SYSTEMS/PRESIDENT |
8/8/2001 |
$2,000 |
HILLPAC |
WAKSAL, SAMUEL D NEW YORK, NY 10014 |
IMCLONE SYSTEMS |
12/20/2001 |
$1,000 |
Schumer, Charles E |
WAKSAL, SAMUEL D NEW YORK, NY 10014 |
INCLONE SYSTEMS/CEO |
5/30/2001 |
$5,000 |
Democratic Cmte of New York State |
WAKSAL, SAMUEL D NEW YORK, NY 10017 |
|
6/24/2002 |
-$1,000 |
Baucus, Max |
WAKSAL, SAMUEL D NEW YORK, NY 10017 |
IMCLONE SYSTEMS |
1/25/2002 |
$1,000 |
Baucus, Max |
WAKSAL, SAMUEL D NEW YORK, NY 10017 |
IMCLONE SYSTEMS INC |
8/17/2001 |
$1,000 |
Levin, Carl |
2002 cycle data downloaded from FEC on July 29, 2002. Date of request: August 9, 2002
To: KLT
I haven't read the article yet, but I must say, GREAT TITLE.
6 posted on
08/09/2002 4:55:02 AM PDT by
Petronski
To: KLT
7 posted on
08/09/2002 4:56:49 AM PDT by
McGruff
To: KLT
S E N A T O R (D - NY) Hillary Rodham Clinton
1997-2002 Total Receipts: $30,745,791 1997-2002 Total Spent: $30,609,403 Cash on Hand: $136,385 Date of last report: December 31, 2001 First elected 2000 Next election 2006
Fundraising by Cycle: 2002: $591,865 2000: $30,153,926
Source of Funds: (How to read this chart / methodology)
|
|
Individual contributions |
$24,575,620 |
(79.9%) |
|
PAC contributions |
$1,019,992 |
(3.3%) |
|
Candidate self-financing |
$0 |
|
|
Other |
$5,150,179 |
(16.8%) |
PAC Contribution Breakdown (How to read this chart / methodology)
|
|
Business |
$302,669 |
(30.8%) |
|
Labor |
$436,150 |
(44.4%) |
|
Ideological/Single Issue |
$243,044 |
(24.8%) |
Quality of Disclosure: (How to read this chart / methodology)
|
|
Full Disclosure |
$13,908,537 |
(90.9%) |
|
Incomplete |
$149,503 |
(1.0%) |
|
No Disclosure |
$1,245,472 |
(8.1%) |
|
|
|
To: Howlin
bttt
To: KLT
...the party is keeping the money because Sam Waksal "has not been convicted of a crime, and he was a strong supporter of the Democratic Party long before this."...the CRIME SYNDICATE is keeping the money because one of OUR CRIMINALS gave it to us.
10 posted on
08/09/2002 5:01:32 AM PDT by
PGalt
To: KLT
Looks like this election cycle does not bode well for the Dimocrats. All their major contributors are going to jail. Go figure!
14 posted on
08/09/2002 5:08:21 AM PDT by
bear24
To: KLT
Hillary: out of the pants suit, into the Robert Blake-style jumpsuit!
To: KLT
That money could help prop up a pension plan or put a poor kid thru college. Better yet, it could be used to develop a machine that dis-assembles copies of "It Takes a Village" and converts the pages into single ply toilet paper.
19 posted on
08/09/2002 5:17:15 AM PDT by
Feckless
To: KLT
I think you guys have got this all wrong. I have good information from a reliable source that this wasn't a donation from Waksal at all, it was payment for services Hillary rendered in the form of investment advice to Waksal. He was thinking of getting into cattle futures. [winks]
20 posted on
08/09/2002 5:23:14 AM PDT by
Kenton
To: KLT
from AP:
"WASHINGTON- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton trolled for an invitation Thursday to hot, dusty Crawford, Texas, to spend some time with the Republican who replaced her husband in the White House.Clinton said she wants to lobby the vacationing President Bush on World Trade Center aid. The New York Democrat wants to bring along firefighters, ironworkers and others from ground zero to help make the case for additional funds for a health tracking system and better radios for emergency workers."
I figure Hillary couldn't pay New York's finest to participate in this little stunt, but someone ought to tell Hillary to stop milking the public teat and donate some of her own money to the Trade Center Aid Fund.
21 posted on
08/09/2002 5:32:00 AM PDT by
YaYa123
To: KLT
Senior NY Senator - $3,000
Junior NY Senator - $20,000
Chuckie, Chuckie, Chuckie. You're gettin' hosed.
To: KLT
So far as we know, he did not give us any money in 2002," said Clinton spokeswoman Karen Dunn. And if he did, just try and find it.
To: KLT
This news will go no further than the NY Post. perhaps a few other conservative sites will run it but it will NEVER be said or printed in the maistream liberal media.
31 posted on
08/09/2002 7:33:52 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: KLT
So far as we know, he did not give us any money in 2002A typical democrat spin reflex. He (probably) didn't give you any money in 1492, 1776, or 1861. SO WHAT? The issue is the money he did you give you, not the money he didn't give you.
To: KLT
The Democrats have started to figure out if they gave back
all their tainted cash, they wouldn't have any left to spend for elections or put in their own pockets.
Therefore, Hillary has now set the new standard by stonewalling any "tainted cash" return movement. It was getting out of hand. Returning tainted funds was started by her felon husband with the Chinese money connection (even though they talked more about returning the money than doing it), so I guess she feels she has a right to reverse it.
Besides, there is not a Senate Ethics Committee that will do anything about it, so she's home free!
Look for the rest of the Democrat criminals (but, I repeat myself) to take her lead and follow suit. Meanwhile, they'll turn up the rhetorical heat on the Republicans to return their $100 pittances they may have received from the same felons. Moral Equivalencee, you know!
41 posted on
08/09/2002 8:22:52 AM PDT by
Gritty
To: KLT
Everytime that I hear a media person villifying Martha Stewart, I think about Hillary's insider trading of pork belly futures.
43 posted on
08/09/2002 8:58:35 AM PDT by
Eva
To: KLT
Now why doesn't the mainstream media publish this around the country? Because the media supports Hitlery and Billy Bubba Clintoon? I can just hear the democrazies accusing the Republicans of just this filthiness to deflect attention upon Hitlery's actions. She's so bloody protected by the democrazies that it creates ad nauseaum.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson