Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hope Yet for Earth Summit - UN Environment Chief ( Money Thanks America )
Reuters ^ | August 08, 2002 | By Mark John

Posted on 08/08/2002 9:27:43 PM PDT by USA21

PARIS (Reuters) - A new U.S. cash handout to a global ecology fund and signs that rich nations will take a bigger role in cleaning up the planet could yet save this month's "Earth Summit" from failure, a top U.N. official said on Thursday.

U.N. Environment Program chief Klaus Toepfer said he had seen progress in tackling some of the issues that scuppered a preparatory meeting in June for the Johannesburg summit aimed at alleviating world poverty and protecting the environment.

"I believe there is a lot of activity going on to come to this Plan of Implementation and to have also the commitment of governments," said UNEP Executive Director Toepfer, who was briefing reporters during a trip to Paris.

The final "Plan of Implementation" is hoped to include firm pledges made at the meeting of over 100 heads of state and 60,000 delegates in Johannesburg from August 26 to September 4.

Toepfer said he was optimistic agreement could be reached on one of the toughest hurdles faced in Bali, that of rich countries acknowledging that they have caused most environmental problems and therefore have a greater duty to tackle them.

"This is a field where I believe a compromise can be achieved," he said.

Toepfer hailed Wednesday's move by the U.S. government to contribute some $500 million to a $2.92 billion replenishment by 32 donor nations of the Global Environment Facility (GEF), a fund aimed at helping poor countries clean up their environment.

"We have never had such a high replenishment of GEF...The situation for the summit is better as a result of this decision because (the facility) is a means of implementation (of summit accords)," he said.

Toepfer also pointed to aims within the Doha round of trade talks -- formally known as the Doha Development Agenda -- to help poor countries by removing the rich-country agricultural and other subsidies that exacerbate wealth imbalances.

Many fear the Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development -- 10 years after the landmark Rio de Janeiro conference whose ambitious agenda has since fallen prey to broken promises -- will produce nothing but empty rhetoric.

With a mission including efforts to alleviate poverty, clean up global pollution and help secure water supplies, critics say the summit has bitten off more than it can chew.

Developing nations have complained that some targets under discussion -- such as a plan to halve by 2015 the number of people living on less than $1 a day -- are so long-term as to make it impossible to hold countries accountable to commitments.

Many involved in the summit have been disappointed that President Bush -- who pulled the United States out of the Kyoto protocol to combat global warming -- has not yet said whether he will attend in Johannesburg.

But Toepfer noted his father, former President George Bush, had gone to the Rio conference at very short notice.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: earthsummit; environmentalism; sustainablity; un; unitednations

1 posted on 08/08/2002 9:27:44 PM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: USA21
A new U.S. cash handout to a global ecology fund
2 posted on 08/08/2002 9:29:31 PM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA21
"Toepfer hailed Wednesday's move by the U.S. government to contribute some $500 million to a $2.92 billion replenishment by 32 donor nations of the Global Environment Facility (GEF), a fund aimed at helping poor countries clean up their environment."

STOP SPENDING OUR HARD EARNED TAX DOLLARS GEORGE! My pocket is NOT a bottomless pit!

3 posted on 08/08/2002 9:53:34 PM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: brat
Sounds like classic re-distribution of wealth. Can you say Communism?
4 posted on 08/08/2002 10:32:06 PM PDT by capecodderathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: USA21
I think W swings too far left too often but I can see the politics here. All the newsoeia screaming "Bush and Republicans deny money to clean up third world eco-disasters" along with video and pictures of little brown kids squatting in asbestos or coughing up PCBs. No, I won't take a shot at him on this one.
5 posted on 08/09/2002 10:21:13 AM PDT by HalfIrish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HalfIrish
Gee, who comes in and cleans up after every single one of those disasters?
6 posted on 08/09/2002 12:01:43 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: brat
I'd love to see the Dems using their usual argument: we can't afford this, SS will be cut, our shrinking surplus (formerly negatively noted as "slush") can't handle this, etc.
7 posted on 08/09/2002 12:03:28 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
The same people who pay for just about everything.. us. I'm thinking that GWB isn't going to attend the conference, so they figured holding the money back, too would give a lot of fodder to the left and their hacks in the media. You know they're going to whine that he doesn't care about the environment in the third world as it is.
8 posted on 08/09/2002 12:13:39 PM PDT by HalfIrish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: USA21
Developing nations have complained that some targets under discussion -- such as a plan to halve by 2015 the number of people living on less than $1 a day -- are so long-term as to make it impossible to hold countries accountable to commitments.

What has this got ot do with an ecology fund?

9 posted on 08/09/2002 1:35:04 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd
bump
10 posted on 08/09/2002 2:54:21 PM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: brat
"Toepfer hailed Wednesday's move by the U.S. government to contribute some $500 million to a $2.92 billion replenishment...

This is raiding the Social Security fund by $500 million. I wonder how many Americans are in favor of transferring money paid by workers into the SS fund, just to see it re-transmitted to a bunch of 3rd world despot dictatorships Swiss bank accounts.

This is another argument for privatizing Social Security. If the individual workers controlled their own private retirement funds, Congress wouldn't have all that money at hand to spend willy nilly as they choose.

11 posted on 08/09/2002 8:24:13 PM PDT by StopGlobalWhining
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson