Posted on 08/08/2002 6:14:24 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:56:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
The sexual abuse scandal in the Roman Catholic Church has raised the specter of a new round of emotional debates on repressed memories, which some people claimed to have "recovered" when making abuse charges.
One of the members of the U.S. bishops panel to police the abuse problem is a well-known critic of therapists who claim to have evoked recovered memories, suggesting the bishops are preparing for this debate.
(Excerpt) Read more at asp.washtimes.com ...
"I'm worried victims will throw in the towel with Dr. McHugh on the panel," David Clohessy, president of SNAP said yesterday.
The chances of these victims just "giving up" and "going away" are slim and none.
SD
I don't recall anything about "repressed" memory in the Bernadin case; I thought the guy dropped out of the suit because he wasn't sure he could trust his memory -- not the same thing IMO. (O'Keefe I never heard of.)
SNAP seems inclined to accept any accusation that comes along the pike, whether credible or not. Perhaps understandable in light of their experiences, but still not fair.
That whole recovered memory "therapy" seems to be quite dangerous -- as I understand it, it's all too easy for a therapist to create a "memory" of something that never happened.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.