Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nick Danger
Oh, so it's "general trends," huh? This is the title: "Women On Road To Nowhere (Study Finds Women Can't Read Maps)"

It doesn't say "some women." It says "women can't read maps." I'd say it's more like "sweeping generalizations."

BTW, there are few landmarks when one is out at sea. Does the person who did the study suggest I count waves to get us back to port, say, "look for a wave that has a big pointy thing at the top & follow that one?"

18 posted on 08/07/2002 8:18:12 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Catspaw
"I'd say it's more like "sweeping generalizations."

Yes, that could be an acceptable description for a statistical "trend." It's a bell curve thing. People who use these methods and terms understand that there's a 10 to 20 percent population on either side of the norm who buck the "trend."

71 posted on 08/08/2002 2:03:59 PM PDT by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson