Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fusion reactor breaks duration record
New Scientist ^ | 8/6/02 | Jeff Hecht

Posted on 08/06/2002 9:04:15 PM PDT by Brett66

Fusion reactor breaks duration record

10:50 06 August 02

NewScientist.com news service

A powerful plasma discharge has operated for a world record 210 seconds in an experimental French fusion reactor. The demonstration is a significant step toward the long plasma confinement times needed in a practical fusion reactor.

Physicists sustained the three-megawatt electric discharge in the Tore Supra reactor at the Association Euratom-CEA in Cadarache. During that interval, it dissipated more than 600 megajoules of energy, more than twice the previous record, also set by Tore Supra in 1996.

The record was broken thanks to an upgrade that added active cooling to the tokamak, the reaction vessel. The experiment was also the first one to use a series of superconducting coils to generate a strong permanent toroidal magnetic field to contain the plasma. The scientists did not aim to demonstrate nuclear fusion on this occasion.

Operating time has been a key technology limit for fusion, says Federico Casci of the European Fusion Development Agreement office in Garching near Munich, Germany. Previous experiments have heated and compressed nuclear fuel to the point where the nuclei of heavy hydrogen isotopes fuse and release energy. But the confinement times were so brief that the reaction released little energy.

Heat sink

The new test was conducted as part of the planning for ITER, the International Tokamak Engineering Reactor to be built by the European Union, Russia, Japan, and Canada.

"ITER is aiming for half-hour pulses," Casci told New Scientist, so its designers needed to test systems that could efficiently remove the heat energy deposited in the hot plasma. He calls the demonstration "a key piece in the puzzle of building ITER" and hopes further tests will yield even better results.

ITER's planners hope to decide on a site in 2003; candidates are in Japan, France, Spain, and Canada. If all goes to plan, construction will begin in 2005, with operation to start around 2013. The US, which earlier withdrew from ITER, is now considering returning.

Researchers expect ITER to be a significant advance over existing fusion reactors because it promises for the first time to let them study key parameters such as confinement time, temperature, density and pressure all at the same time. The conditions required for fusion are so difficult that existing tokamaks are limited to testing one parameter at a time.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; fusion; realscience

1 posted on 08/06/2002 9:04:15 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Good.
2 posted on 08/06/2002 9:05:25 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Tokamak still rules. They are doing incredible things with plasma control and materials science. Who knows, they might get this to work after all.
3 posted on 08/06/2002 9:08:14 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
The scientists did not aim to demonstrate nuclear fusion on this occasion.

I thought this was rather humerous. Reminds me of a movie where they couldn't get it stopped either.
When you try to play god you had better get it right.

4 posted on 08/06/2002 9:10:18 PM PDT by Winston Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
During that interval, it dissipated more than 600 megajoules of energy

600 megajoules? Wow that's nearly half the energy used by Anna Nicole Smith when she walks 10 feet. Which in her case should be described as "MOOving".

5 posted on 08/06/2002 9:34:59 PM PDT by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Fusion reactor breaks duration record

I couldn't figure out why my wife was calling me "fusion reactor" all day. This clears it up.

6 posted on 08/06/2002 9:37:26 PM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *RealScience; Ernest_at_the_Beach; sourcery
fyi
7 posted on 08/06/2002 9:41:33 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
It sounds like they are significantly ahead of us in this area. Do we have anything that is promising?
8 posted on 08/06/2002 10:31:18 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DB
We tried but the EPA and Greenpeace made us stop ;)
9 posted on 08/06/2002 11:47:20 PM PDT by Winston Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DB
Viagra?
10 posted on 08/06/2002 11:59:13 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Did the U.S. drop out of ITER? At one time I thought we were "in".

--Boris

11 posted on 08/07/2002 7:08:45 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB
they are significantly ahead of us

Although the facility is not on American soil, American scientists are well-represented. It is an international effort; each scientist has his own funding sources.

12 posted on 08/07/2002 9:02:19 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson