Skip to comments.
I Walked into a Crowd of War Protesters with my Sign (BOMB IRAQ)
8/6/2002
| TLBSHOW
Posted on 08/06/2002 11:59:50 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 next last
To: desertcry
# 159: You make the case for taking his arse out-you are saying it is him or us-let it be SADAM.
To: justshe
Saddam is trying to buy TIME CHEAPLY. But will be very clostly to American lives. Timing is everything.
To: F.J. Mitchell
To what rant, or whining are refering to? You lost me there buddy.
To: TLBSHOW
OPERATION INSTANT INFINITE FREEP A new way to show our support.
To: TLBSHOW
Great Solo FREEP!
To: Born in a Rage
Your post of my response was rather disingenuous, don't you think? You wrote:
AND......I trust our President. I don't believe that the case has to be made to the people at all.
You then went on to post your outrage at my post.
Whereas, if you look at my TOTAL post, it reads much different and negates the reason for your outrage.
My total post was:
I don't believe that the case has to be made to the people at all. He is the Commander In Chief and when the time is right, he will talk to us. And not before. Nor should he.
Your assertion re: my thinking that going to war is some sort of privilege is patently false. The entire difference between us, I think, is that you want to know NOW why this is being considered/planned, and I am willing to wait, knowing that President Bush will tell me in good time.
166
posted on
08/06/2002 4:08:58 PM PDT
by
justshe
To: RightWhale
"I don't see it."
Gas was 1.51 here (So. Cal.) for two months then dropped to 1.49 and a week later is now 1.53.
The USA is storing 25 million gallons of oil between now and Jan, 2003.
To: desertcry
Rant # 154.
To: Fred Mertz
So you think we should BOMB IRAQ? How many troops would you be willing to put at risk?Iraq is a terrorist state that is already putting our troops and civilians around the world at risk and has for may years.
Use the rat poison before the rats are out of control.
169
posted on
08/06/2002 4:14:20 PM PDT
by
pfflier
To: TLBSHOW
To: F.J. Mitchell
It looks like you did not get the point I tried to make, and that is: I would rather risk our brave, and gallant troops to fight , and get rid of saddam, than lose thousands of innocent civilian lives, if we don't take care of the madman of iraq. Plain enough?
To: Born in a Rage
This "no proof" argument was also used against going into WW2. The public poo-pooed information about the concentration camps and said there was no proof. They fell for tactics like the bogus Red Cross "inspection" of Terezenstat, which is exactly what Saddam has in mind for the "inspections" he has now offered to the UN and US. I can't wait for the cable TV equivalent of the newsreel feature, "Hitler Builds the Jews a Town!"
The fact that you cite Vietnam gives some insight into your ideology, which, I presume, would be against war in virtually any event. You ask for "proof." Do you read? Just the NY Times or other sources? If you read the experts on the area with an open mind, you would find plenty of evidence that this is a guy who is a danger to the world.
You state, "This isn't WW2." No, it's not. It's even more perilous because the enemy is dispersed and is ensconsed in every nation in the world.
By the way, Iraq never surrendered in the 1991 war. This is only a cease-fire, predicated on Saddam's compliance with all of the conditions imposed by the UN at the time. For nearly 5 years, he has not complied. What does this tell you? What does it tell you that the previous Administration let him get away with it, not to mention the UN?
172
posted on
08/06/2002 5:14:35 PM PDT
by
Inkie
To: fivetoes
Howdy fivetoes!,
How about this guy! We could use him anyday at our FReep.
TBLSHOW!!, We are proud of you, a true patriot. The subversive agitators on this thread are clueless. They are Saddam's Useful Idiots.
The WWII generation taught me one thing to never forget. When a tyrant like Hitler arises again,(and they always do), KILL HIM. Yes folks, kill Saddam and his band of thugs. The pacifists out ther won't like it but who cares.
For the rest of you reading this please go to the home page and read about OPERATION INFINITE FREEP. This is catching on.
To: AdamSelene235
I object to even spending money on nukes.
Why? Its just a very effective explosive.
The governments of Iran, Iraq, Saudi and Kuwait are enemies of their own people.
They need to go. Because they're not worth the investment!
They need to be overthrown by black ops, and the whole lot of them murdered in their sleep. I'm opposed to fielding American armies and risking the lives of thousands of kids on a bunch of camel jockeys who don't deserve anything more than a military coup and an American puppet government.
We're going to start a conventional war with these pukes and risk the lives of our kids, the life of any one of whom is worth more than that of everyone in the entirety of Iraq, just because we're afraid of what France might say if we just send a commando team in there and kill Saddam and all his generals (JUST for instance) or the entire Saudi "Royal" Family (Just for another instance) instead of "Behaving In A Civilized Manner" toward a bunch of goat-f***ing barbarians who don't even WANT civilization in their stinking third-world bugholes.
To: fire_eye
They need to be overthrown by black ops, and the whole lot of them murdered in their sleep. I'm opposed to fielding American armies and risking the lives of thousands of kids on a bunch of camel jockeys who don't deserve anything more than a military coup and an American puppet government. That's what we've been doing for the last 50 years. Its doesn't work.
We're going to start a conventional war with these pukes and risk the lives of our kids, the life of any one of whom is worth more than that of everyone in the entirety of Iraq,
This is why we should use small 10-100 kton class devices. Its not worth the lives of our troops. After the 3rd or 4th city gets smoked, they'll surrender. Terms are unconditional no UN bs.
just because we're afraid of what France might say if we just send a commando team in there and kill Saddam and all his generals (JUST for instance) or the entire Saudi "Royal" Family (Just for another instance) instead of "Behaving In
I doubt a commando team could do the job..Maybe this would make a nice Bruckenheimer flick, but this won't work in the real world. Cruise missles were designed to be nuclear. Lets use them.
To: TLBSHOW
OH MY GOSH!! GOOD JOB!! AND MANY MANY KUDOS!!!
To: fivetoes
Great Post and thank you.
177
posted on
08/06/2002 6:51:05 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: TLBSHOW
Ya know what, bud? You've got stones. I admire that. Good job.
To: desertcry
"Plain enough?"
Plain enough, and I agree. I just don't like the term "innocent Civilians" , it makes me wonder just what the hell our men and women in uniform are guilty of, other than loving this country so much they are willing to die defending it?
To: carenot
NO!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson