Replies

I think this time the people can clearly see the liberal media bias.

Clinton had 8 years and did nothing unless it helped hide his impeachment scandel.

Terrorism came to America under his watch.

You may be right that the people can see the bias, but I am not that hopeful...Sadly, the vast majority get their "news" for the big three networks...they do not see Ann Coulter make mince-meat of the "Clinton had a plan" tripe on cable....however, we can HOPE that those who hear this "report" stop and ask: "Hey, wait a minute. If you had a plan, why the hell didn't YOU do something?"

This story in Time is sickening in it's baldfaced effort to make cover the negligent rearends of Clinton officials, and in trying to portray GW Bush and his officials as incompetent. The effort of Clinton's formal officials to justify themselves, and the liberal media's effort to be their apologists, makes me conclude that these people are culpable in the intelligence failures that led to the attacks on 9/11. They recognize how vulnerable they are to the negative conclusions of history, and are furiously trying, not to spin facts, but to actually make up, manufacture "facts" or events.

This Time story is the most baldfaced, and most desparate effort yet, to try to infuse the Clinton Administration with a hint of competence.