Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hattend
Jane Clayson interviewed Time reporter Massimo Calabressi and displayed more skepticism than Rather would later in the day toward the Clinton spin. One of her questions: "So if this plan was so extensive and so important to the Clinton administration why didn't they follow through on it themselves?"

Credit where credit is due.

10 posted on 08/06/2002 9:09:50 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
"So if this plan was so extensive and so important to the Clinton administration why didn't they follow through on it themselves?"

Precisely. This is such an obvious and desperate attempt to build the shattered reputation of the Clinton Administration that the absurdity of it would be laughable if it weren't such a hideous effort to build some partisan legacy on the dead bodies of the victims of 9/11.

I swear, may God strike me dead if I ever vote for the trash that parades around as the "New Democratic" Party, created in the mold of Bill Clinton.

14 posted on 08/06/2002 9:19:52 AM PDT by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson